Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoksevim, Metin
dc.contributor.authorAkcay, Murat
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorYenercag, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorCerik, Bugra
dc.contributor.authorGedikli, Omer
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Mahmut
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:17:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:17:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn1880-4276
dc.identifier.issn1883-2148
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12331
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10008
dc.descriptionyenercag, mustafa/0000-0002-0933-7852; cerik, idris bugra/0000-0003-1419-3950en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000538684800017en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 32528578en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a device-based method of treatment which decreases morbidity and mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study was aimed to investigate the effects of CRT on hemodynamic and arterial stiffness parameters evaluated by noninvasive method, and determine whether there is a correlation between the changes after CRT in these parameters and the clinical response to CRT or not. Methods: The study included 46 patients with HFrEF who were planned to undergo CRT implantation. Before the CRT implantation, clinical and demographic data were recorded from all patients. Hemodynamic and arterial stiffness parameters were measured oscillometrically by an arteriograph before CRT implantation. The patients were re-evaluated minimum three months after CRT; the above-mentioned parameters were measured again and compared to the pre-CRT period. Results: Compared to the period before CRT, mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) (116.8 +/- 19.1 mm Hg vs 127.7 +/- 20.9 mm Hg, P = .005), central SBP (cSBP) (106.2 +/- 17.3 mm Hg vs 116.8 +/- 18.7 mm Hg, P = .015), cardiac output (CO) (4.6 +/- 0.8 lt/min vs 5.1 +/- 0.8 lt/min, P = .002), stroke volume (65.6 +/- 16.3 mL vs 72.0 +/- 14.9 mL), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) (10 +/- 1.6 m/sec vs 10.4 +/- 1.8 m/sec, P = .004) increased significantly in post-CRT period. In addition, the same parameters were significantly increased post-CRT period in patients with clinical response. However, there was not any similar increase in nonresponder patients. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that SBP, CO, and PWV increased significantly after CRT. The modest increases in these parameters were observed to be associated with positive clinical outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/joa3.12331en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectcardiac responseen_US
dc.subjectcardiac resynchronization therapyen_US
dc.subjectcongestive heart failureen_US
dc.subjecthemodynamics parametersen_US
dc.subjectpulse wave velocityen_US
dc.titleThe effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on arterial stiffness and central hemodynamic parametersen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage498en_US
dc.identifier.endpage507en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Arrhythmiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record