Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaya, O. A.
dc.contributor.authorMuglali, M.
dc.contributor.authorTorul, D.
dc.contributor.authorKaya, I.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:25:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:25:50Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1119-3077
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_502_18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10557
dc.descriptionWOS: 000506577700011en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31607728en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of hyaluronic acid (HA) and xenografts on the repair of peri-implant dehiscence-type bone defects occur during implant placement. Patients and Methods: Forty-two dehiscence Class I type defects located on the buccal surface of the implants were included in this study. Defects were divided into two main groups as small sized (height of <3 mm) and medium sized (height between 3 and 5 mm). Both of the main groups were further divided into two subgroups as HA plus xenograft plus collagen membrane (HAXC) or xenograft plus collagen membrane (XC) applied groups. After grafting, repair of defect site was evaluated with the help of the cross-sectional images on cone-beam computed tomography at 6(th) and 12(th) months. Results: In both main groups, vertical bone height (VBH) was higher in defects repaired with HAXC (2.65 +/- 1.12 mm) than in the XC (2.45 +/- 1.10 mm) groups at the 6(th) month. However, the difference between two subgroups was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Reduction in VBH was observed up to 6-12 months after prosthetic loading in all defect sites. This reduction was found statistically significant in medium-sized defects that grafted with XC (P < 0.05, paired t-test). However, in other subgroups, the difference between measurements at 6(th) and 12(th) months was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions: According to the data obtained from this study, it can be concluded that HA did not have a significant positive effect on the repair of defects around dental implants.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/njcp.njcp_502_18en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAlveolar ridge augmentationen_US
dc.subjectdehiscenceen_US
dc.subjectdental implantsen_US
dc.subjectguided bone regenerationen_US
dc.subjecthyaluronic aciden_US
dc.subjectperi-implant defectsen_US
dc.titlePeri-implant bone defects: A 1-year follow-up comparative study of use of hyaluronic acid and xenograftsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1388en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1395en_US
dc.relation.journalNigerian Journal of Clinical Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record