Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Baris
dc.contributor.authorOzceylan, Eren
dc.contributor.authorSaricicek, Inci
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:25:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:25:50Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344
dc.identifier.issn1614-7499
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06298-1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10561
dc.descriptionOZCEYLAN, Eren/0000-0002-5213-6335; Ozkan, Baris/0000-0001-7767-4087; SARICICEK, INCI/0000-0002-3528-7342en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000494047900017en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31493083en_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the cheapest and proper methods for the ultimate disposal of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) is landfilling. However, determining the location of landfill sites is a difficult and complex task due to depending on social, environmental, technical, economic, and legal factors. To solve the aforementioned challenges related to the landfill site suitability analysis, the combinations of Geographic Information System (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) have been studied by academia and applied by experts over the years. This notice is apparent by the large number of academic papers which have been announced in the near future. To provide a framework of the existing literature, and to guide colleagues, a state-of-the-art of recent papers is crucial. The goal of this study is to review all scientific papers in GIS-based MCDM modeling for landfill site suitability analysis in academic journals. A total of 106 studies published between 2005 and 2019 are recorded and surveyed. The studies are then investigated and classified by a generated taxonomy including following categories: GIS software, application area, uncertainty, MCDM techniques, cell sizes in GIS, and criteria. Based on the review conducted, it is observed that while Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) are the most widely used MCDM methods for weighting the criteria and ranking the alternatives, respectively. On the other hand, while environmental dimension is the most commonly preferred main criteria, surface water comes first in the sub-criteria pool. Criteria analysis shows that surface and ground water, geology, land use, distance to fault zone, distance to urban areas, and distance to road and slope are the most commonly used criteria groups among others. These classifications and observations are helpful for identifying research gaps in the current literature and provide insights for future modeling and research efforts in the field.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s11356-019-06298-1en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGeographic information systemen_US
dc.subjectLandfillen_US
dc.subjectMulti-criteria decision-makingen_US
dc.subjectReviewen_US
dc.subjectSite suitabilityen_US
dc.titleGIS-based MCDM modeling for landfill site suitability analysis: A comprehensive review of the literatureen_US
dc.typereviewen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue30en_US
dc.identifier.startpage30711en_US
dc.identifier.endpage30730en_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster