Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKutuk, Nikhet
dc.contributor.authorBas, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorKazan, Dilara
dc.contributor.authorYuceer, Ezgi
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:26:33Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:26:33Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.issn1531-5053
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.041
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10766
dc.descriptionWOS: 000473197100012en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 30825439en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Arthrocentesis is an effective, simple, and minimally invasive treatment in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) closed lock (CL). The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 1- versus 2-session arthrocentesis procedures in the management of TMJ CL. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the files of patients with TMJ CL according to diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Patients who underwent 1- or 2-session arthrocentesis were included in the study. The decision of whether to undergo 1- or 2-session arthrocentesis was made by the patients: Those who accepted a second arthrocentesis procedure were assigned to group 1 (repeated arthrocentesis group), and those who did not accept, to group 2 (arthrocentesis group). The primary predictor variable was treatment method. TMJ pain (scored on a visual analog scale) and maximum mouth opening (MMO) were selected as the outcome variables. To evaluate the clinical outcomes of 1- or 2-session arthrocentesis, MMO and pain score (on a visual analog scale) before treatment and at 1, 3, and 6 months' follow-up were analyzed. Descriptive, comparative, correlation, and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 30 patients (25 female and 5 male patients) with TMJ disc displacement without reduction were enrolled in the study. Each group consisted of 15 patients. Statistically significant decreases in pain scores and increases in MMO values were observed in both treatment groups at 3 and 6 months (P < .05). At 6 months, MMO values were significantly higher and pain levels were significantly lower in patients who received 2 arthrocentesis procedures. Conclusions: Repeated arthrocentesis is more successful at reducing pain and improving MMO than a single intervention in the treatment of TMJ CL. (C) 2019 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeonsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.joms.2019.01.041en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleIs Repeated Arthrocentesis Beneficial in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Retrospective Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume77en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1359en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1364en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record