Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYucel, Ozlem Eski
dc.contributor.authorBirinci, Hakki
dc.contributor.authorSullu, Yuksel
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T12:27:20Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T12:27:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.issn1573-2630
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-018-0890-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/10908
dc.descriptionWOS: 000462974200020en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 29550932en_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo assess and compare the efficacy over 6months of intravitreal ranibizumab (IR), aflibercept (IA) and dexamethasone implant (IDI) in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).MethodsThis is a retrospective single-center study. Patients who received pro re nata treatment of IR 0.5mg, IA 2mg or IDI 0.7mg (as Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3, respectively) for the treatment of ME due to non-ischemic CRVO were included in the study. Efficacy outcomes were considered as the changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline over 6months.ResultsEighteen patients (Group 1) received IR, 16 patients received (Group 2) IA, and 24 patients (Group 3) received IDI. The mean numbers of injections were 2.561.0, 2.68 +/- 0.9, and 1.62 +/- 0.5 in Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.000). In Groups 1 and 2, the mean BCVA values increased significantly after the treatment (p<0.001). However, in Group 3, no increase in mean BCVA was statistically significant in any month (p=0.061). The proportion of eyes gaining at least three lines in BCVA was 33.3% in Group 1, 43.8% in Group 2, and 33.3% in Group 3 (p=0.762). In all groups, significant improvements were observed in CMT after treatment (p<0.001). At month 6, the mean changes in CMT were -162.7 +/- 186.5 mu m in Group 1, -310.1 +/- 345.9 mu m in Group 2, and -193.8 +/- 228.3 mu m in Group 3, with no significant difference among groups (p=0.474). Cataract formation and IOP increase were higher in the IDI group, but the differences were not statistically significant (p=0.054 and p=0.392, respectively).Conclusions p id=Par4 IR and IA may be preferred treatment for ME due to non-ischemic CRVO as visual improvement remains the primary ophthalmological objective. The most important advantages of IDI are its effect on CMT and the need for fewer injections. The increase in IOP and the formation of cataract may be observed more in IDI-treated eyes.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s10792-018-0890-6en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAflibercepten_US
dc.subjectCentral retinal vein occlusionen_US
dc.subjectDexamethasone implanten_US
dc.subjectMacular edemaen_US
dc.subjectRanibizumaben_US
dc.subjectRetinal vein occlusionen_US
dc.titleThe short-term efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept and dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema due to non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage891en_US
dc.identifier.endpage901en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Ophthalmologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster