Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuruf, Aykut
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Ilkay Koray
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Ahmet Veysel
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:04:58Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:04:58Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issn1303-6165
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1905-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11046
dc.descriptionPolat, Ahmet Veysel/0000-0002-9740-3580; Ozturk, Mesut/0000-0003-4059-2656en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000504050500036en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31651122en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/aim: To evaluate and compare the diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography (SWE) and strain elastography (SE) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and methods: The current study included 87 breast lesions in 84 patients. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categories were determined with ultrasound features. The maximum shear wave velocity (SWV), mean SWV, maximum SWV to fat SWV ratio, and mean SWV to fat SWV ratio were measured using SW E. The strain ratio (SR) was calculated as the ratio of lesion strain to the adjacent fat strain using SE. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess and compare the diagnostic performances of each parameter. Results: Forty-five benign and 42 malignant lesions were diagnosed. The sensitivity and specificity of the BIRADS classification was 100% and 35.6%, respectively. Selecting a cutoff SR value of 3.22 led to an 88.1% sensitivity and an 88.4% specificity (AUC: 0.913 [95% CI: 0.854-0.971), P < 0.001). Selecting cutoff maximum SWV value of 3.41 m/s led to an 88.1% sensitivity and an 86.7% specificity (AUC: 0.918 [95% CI: 0.858-0.978], P < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of the maximum SWV, mean SWV, and maximum SWV to fat SWV ratio were similar to the diagnostic performance of the SR (P= 1.00, P= 1.00, P= 0.629, respectively). Conclusion: SE and SWE are both feasible imaging modalities in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions with similar diagnostic performances.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTubitak Scientific & Technical Research Council Turkeyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3906/sag-1905-15en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBreasten_US
dc.subjectdiagnostic performanceen_US
dc.subjectshear wave elastographyen_US
dc.subjectstrain elastographyen_US
dc.subjectultrasonographyen_US
dc.titleShear wave versus strain elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesionsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1509en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1517en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record