Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAydin, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorAlgan, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorPak, Betul
dc.contributor.authorOcak, Nuh
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:05:08Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:05:08Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1018-4619
dc.identifier.issn1610-2304
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11113
dc.descriptionOcak, Nuh/0000-0001-7393-1373en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000480511400026en_US
dc.description.abstractOne of factors to take into consideration to improve the rangeland quality is forage quality indicators (FQI) such as neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), digestible dry matter (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI), crude protein (CP), metabolizable energy (ME), relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality (RFQ). To study the relations among these indicators and to evaluate the sources of relationships and variations among the rangeland forages, 45 different desirable forage species were collected from Akdag rangelands in Samsun province of Turkey in 2015 and 2016. All FQI were analysed using the restricted maximum likelihood and a multivariate approach. The legume, grass and the other plant family species exhibited generally the highest, the lowest and intermediate FQI, respectively. The quality score based on RFQ was higher for the other family species than those for the legume and grass species. The NDF and ADF contents of species showed negative relationship with ME, RFV and RFQ, while the CP was positively and negatively correlated with these variables. The DDM, ME, RFV, RFQ and DMI components accounted for 86.68% of total variation of species. The first cluster composed of, in general, the legume and the other family species, whereas second cluster included all grass species. In conclusion, the legume and the other family species showed higher quality than grass species. The FQI appeared mainly botanical family dependent rather than single species. The ME, RFV and RFQ rather than the CP should be mainly considered for evaluation of species.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council, TUBITAKTurkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [TO-VAG-214 0 228]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council, TUBITAK (TO-VAG-214 0 228). The authors thank Reyhan Pinar Siizer and Cansu Topcugil for their providing invaluable rangeland and laboratory works during the study period and Dr. Ali Vaiz Garipoglu (English editing and critical editing).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherParlar Scientific Publications (P S P)en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFeed valueen_US
dc.subjectQuality gradeen_US
dc.subjectPrinciple componenten_US
dc.subjectCluster analysisen_US
dc.subjectForage evaluationen_US
dc.titleSimilarity Analysis With Respect To Some Quality Indicators and Quality Categories Based on Relative Forage Quality Ranges of Desirable Rangeland Foragesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage5926en_US
dc.identifier.endpage5936en_US
dc.relation.journalFresenius Environmental Bulletinen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record