Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOzmen, Batuhan
dc.contributor.authorPabuccu, Emre Goksan
dc.contributor.authorSukur, Yavuz Emre
dc.contributor.authorUlubasoglu, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorAtes, Can
dc.contributor.authorSonmezer, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAtabekoglu, Cem Somer
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:07:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:07:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2149-9322
dc.identifier.issn2149-9330
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.12244
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11472
dc.descriptionA AkAr, Yavuz Emre/0000-0003-0815-3522; Ozmen, Batuhan/0000-0002-4504-669X; Atabekoglu, Cem Somer/0000-0003-0264-0709; Berker, Bulent/0000-0001-7346-7128; Sonmezer, Murat/0000-0001-6101-1414; ates, can/0000-0003-2286-4398en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000443619200004en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 30202623en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the impact of peri-implantation prednisolone use and its duration in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles of patients with good prognosis. Materials and Methods: Infertile patients treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol between January 2010 and June 2013 were included. The patients in group A (n=196) received no prednisolone. The patients in groups B (n=397) and C (n=371) received 5 mg oral prednisolone daily, for 4 and 12 days following embryo transfer, respectively. The main outcome parameter was live birth rate. Results: The ages of the groups were 30.1 +/- 4.6, 31.5 +/- 4.5, and 30.9 +/- 4.7 years, respectively (p=0.163). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding cycle characteristics. Implantation rates were 20.7%, 24.6%, and 23.8%, respectively (p=0.163). Miscarriage rates were 1.5%, 3.5%, and 3.2%, respectively (p=0.859). Live birth rates were 28.7%, 29.3%, and 32.8%, respectively (p=0.482). Conclusion: Empiric prednisolone administration during the peri-implantation period does not seem to have beneficial effects in ART cycles of patients with good prognosis.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGalenos Yayinciliken_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4274/tjod.12244en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAssisted reproductive technologyen_US
dc.subjectglucocorticoiden_US
dc.subjectgonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonisten_US
dc.subjectperi-implantation perioden_US
dc.titleA retrospective comparative study of prednisolone use in antagonist co-treated assisted reproductive technology cycles for patients with good prognosisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage147en_US
dc.identifier.endpage151en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster