Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTuhta, Sertac
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:10:53Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:10:53Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1229-9367
dc.identifier.issn1598-6233
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.2.223
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11526
dc.descriptionWOS: 000442623800007en_US
dc.description.abstractNowadays, there are a great number of various structures that have been retrofitted by using different FRP Composites. Due to this, more researches need to be conducted to know more the characteristics of these structures, not only that but also a comparison among them before and after the retrofitting is needed. In this research, a model steel structure is tested using a bench-scale earthquake simulator on the shake table, using recorded micro tremor data, in order to get the dynamic behaviors. Columns of the model steel structure are then retrofitted by using GFRP composite, and then tested on the Quanser shake table by using the recorded micro tremor data. At this stage, it is needed to evaluate the dynamic behaviors of the retrofitted model steel structure. Various types of methods of OMA, such as EFDD, SSI, etc. are used to take action in the ambient responses. Having a purpose to learn more about the effects of GFRP composite, experimental model analysis of both types (retrofitted and no-retrofitted models) is conducted to evaluate their dynamic behaviors. There is a provision of ambient excitation to the shake table by using recorded micro tremor ambient vibration data on ground level. Furthermore, the Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition is used through output-only modal identification. At the end of this study, moderate correlation is obtained between mode shapes, periods and damping ratios. The aim of this research is to show and determine the effects of GFRP Composite implementation on structural responses of the model steel structure, in terms of changing its dynamical behaviors. The frequencies for model steel structure and the retrofitted model steel structure are shown to be 33.916% in average difference. Finally, it is shown that, in order to evaluate the period and rigidity of retrofitted structures, OMA might be used.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTechno-Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.12989/scs.2018.28.2.223en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectexperimental modal analysisen_US
dc.subjectGFRPen_US
dc.subjectsteel structureen_US
dc.subjectEFDDen_US
dc.subjectshake tableen_US
dc.titleGFRP retrofitting effect on the dynamic characteristics of model steel structureen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage223en_US
dc.identifier.endpage231en_US
dc.relation.journalSteel and Composite Structuresen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster