Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gulsah
dc.contributor.authorOzyurek, Taha
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Koray
dc.contributor.authorGundogar, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorPlotino, Gianluca
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:11:15Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:11:15Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11654
dc.descriptionGrande, Nicola Maria/0000-0003-3407-9768; Plotino, Gianluca/0000-0003-3003-8029en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000431942400030en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 29550013en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of apically extruded debris by Reciproc Blue (REC Blue; VDW, Munich, Germany), HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland), and XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) files during root canal preparation at body temperature. Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar human teeth were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 20). The canals were instrumented using 1 of the following instruments: REC Blue, HEDM, or XPS. Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. All the procedures were performed at 35 degrees C. The amount of extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the weight value of the tooth-free apparatus from the postpreparation weight value. The data were analyzed using the KruskalWallis test at a 5% significance level. Results: All the instruments tested caused extrusion of some debris from the apical foramen. XPS extruded significantly less debris from the apex than REC Blue (P < .05). The difference among the HEDM group and the other groups was not significant (P > .05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the amount of apically extruded debris registered for the different files tested was REC Blue > HEDM > XPS, with a statistical difference only between XPS and REC Blue.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgar gel modelen_US
dc.subjectapical extrusionen_US
dc.subjectdebrisen_US
dc.subjectnickel-titaniumen_US
dc.subjectinstrumentsen_US
dc.titleApically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Filesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage856en_US
dc.identifier.endpage859en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster