| dc.contributor.author | Uslu, Gulsah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ozyurek, Taha | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yilmaz, Koray | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gundogar, Mustafa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Plotino, Gianluca | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T13:11:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T13:11:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0099-2399 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1878-3554 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/11654 | |
| dc.description | Grande, Nicola Maria/0000-0003-3407-9768; Plotino, Gianluca/0000-0003-3003-8029 | en_US |
| dc.description | WOS: 000431942400030 | en_US |
| dc.description | PubMed: 29550013 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the amount of apically extruded debris by Reciproc Blue (REC Blue; VDW, Munich, Germany), HyFlex EDM (HEDM; Coltene/Whaledent, Altstatten, Switzerland), and XP-endo Shaper (XPS; FKG Dentaire SA, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) files during root canal preparation at body temperature. Methods: Sixty extracted single-rooted mandibular premolar human teeth were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n = 20). The canals were instrumented using 1 of the following instruments: REC Blue, HEDM, or XPS. Apically extruded debris during instrumentation was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. All the procedures were performed at 35 degrees C. The amount of extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the weight value of the tooth-free apparatus from the postpreparation weight value. The data were analyzed using the KruskalWallis test at a 5% significance level. Results: All the instruments tested caused extrusion of some debris from the apical foramen. XPS extruded significantly less debris from the apex than REC Blue (P < .05). The difference among the HEDM group and the other groups was not significant (P > .05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the amount of apically extruded debris registered for the different files tested was REC Blue > HEDM > XPS, with a statistical difference only between XPS and REC Blue. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Science Inc | en_US |
| dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1016/j.joen.2018.01.018 | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Agar gel model | en_US |
| dc.subject | apical extrusion | en_US |
| dc.subject | debris | en_US |
| dc.subject | nickel-titanium | en_US |
| dc.subject | instruments | en_US |
| dc.title | Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Files | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 44 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 856 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 859 | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Journal of Endodontics | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |