Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUslu, Gulsah
dc.contributor.authorOzyurek, Taha
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Koray
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:17:41Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:17:41Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/12072
dc.descriptionWOS: 000418878600019en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 29032817en_US
dc.description.abstractAims: The aims of the present study were to examine the surface topographies of intact HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM nickel-titanium files and to compare alterations in the surface topographies of these files after root canal preparation of severely curved canals of molar teeth. Methods: Eight HyFlex CM (25/.08) and 8 HyFlex EDM (25/.08) files were included in the present study. In total, 64 severely curved canals of molar teeth, with curvature angles ranging between 50 and 70, were prepared with HyFlex CM and EDM (n = 32 in each group). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the files' surface deformation were performed by using three-dimensional optical profilometry before and after root canal preparation. The data were analyzed with the Student t test at the 5% significant level by using SPSS 21.0 software. Results: In the HyFlex EDM group, the qualitative evaluation revealed the presence of cracks and microcavities after use of the file for root canal preparation, whereas only minor surface deformation was observed in the HyFlex CM group. The average roughness, root mean square roughness, and peak to valley height values of the HyFlex EDM group were significantly higher than those of the HyFlex CM group before and after root canal preparation (P <.05). The surface roughness values were statistically significantly increased in the HyFlex CM group after root canal preparation (P <.05). In contrast, the increase in the HyFlex EDM group was not statistically significant (P>.5). Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, the HyFlex.CM files showed significantly higher surface alterations compared with the Hy Flex EDM files after the preparation of severely curved root canals.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.023en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectHyFlex CMen_US
dc.subjectHyFlex EDMen_US
dc.subjectNiTien_US
dc.subjectprofilometryen_US
dc.subjectsurface deformationen_US
dc.titleComparison of Alterations in the Surface Topographies of HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM Nickel-titanium Files after Root Canal Preparation: A Three-dimensional Optical Profilometry Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage115en_US
dc.identifier.endpage119en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster