Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorIsik, Dogan
dc.contributor.authorDok, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorAltop, Emine K.
dc.contributor.authorMennan, Husrev
dc.contributor.authorZandstra, Bernard H.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:18:25Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:18:25Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0334-2123
dc.identifier.issn1876-7184
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-017-0608-8
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/12266
dc.descriptionKaya Altop, Emine/0000-0002-0987-9352en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000415071600016en_US
dc.description.abstractUse of reduced and no-tillage systems has increased in recent years due to concerns for ecological and economic sustainability of agricultural production. Effective weed control is a serious concern in reduced tillage production. This study was conducted to investigate weed control practices in reduced and no-till maize production. The most effective timing of glyphosate application, either before or after sowing, was investigated in combination with pre-emergence application of acetochlor (840 g a.i/L), post-emergence application of foramsulfuron (22.5 g a.i/L), and two hoeing treatments. The treatments were maintained on the same plots during 2011 and 2012 to evaluate the cumulative effects of the treatments. Main plot treatments consisted of four timings of glyphosate application: 20 or 10 days before sowing, day of sowing, 5 days after sowing, and an untreated control. Sub-plot treatments were: pre- plus post-emergence herbicides, pre-emergence herbicide plus rotary hoeing, post-emergence herbicide plus rotary hoeing, and post-emergence herbicide plus two hoeing treatments (rotary and lister hoe). In the main plots, the lowest weed biomass was produced in glyphosate treatments at sowing and 5 days after sowing; the highest biomass was produced in control plots and in the plots with glyphosate treatments 20 days before sowing. In the sub-plots, the greatest weed biomass was produced in plots with two hoeing treatments (rotary and lister hoe). Glyphosate treatments at sowing and post-emergence herbicide treatment combinations produced the best weed control. Economic analysis revealed that pre-sowing, non-selective herbicide treatments provided a slight increase in net profit. Mechanical hoeing decreased net income due to increased production costs. The highest income was obtained from the pre-emergence plus post-emergence herbicide treatment combinations with no glyphosate.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTurkish Ministry of Food Agriculture and LivestockGida Tarim Ve Hayvancilik Bakanligi [TAGEM/BS-10/07-03/04-01]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was funded by a grant provided by Turkish Ministry of Food Agriculture and Livestock (TAGEM/BS-10/07-03/04-01).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s12600-017-0608-8en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNo-tillen_US
dc.subjectWeed controlen_US
dc.subjectMaizeen_US
dc.subjectBlack Sea region of Turkeyen_US
dc.titleBest timing for glyphosate treatments and possible combinations with pre and post-emergence weed control practices in no-till maizeen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume45en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage611en_US
dc.identifier.endpage618en_US
dc.relation.journalPhytoparasiticaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster