Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaleli, Necati
dc.contributor.authorSarac, Duygu
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:19:04Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:19:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/12376
dc.descriptionWOS: 000406079900013en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 28343670en_US
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Most studies evaluating dental laser sintering systems have focused on the marginal accuracy of the restorations. However, the bond strength at the metal-ceramic interface is another important factor that affects the survival of restorations, and currently, few studies focus on this aspect. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the porcelain bond strength of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) metal frameworks prepared by using the conventional lost-wax tech nique, milling, direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), and laser cusing, a direct process powder bed system. Material and methods. A total of 96 metal frameworks (n=24 in each group) were prepared by using conventional lost-wax (group C), milling (group M), DMLS (group LS), and direct process powder-bed (group LC) methods according to International Organization for Standardization standard ISO 9693-1. After porcelain application, a 3-point bend test was applied to each specimen by using a universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and Tukey honest significant difference tests (alpha=.05). Failure types at the metal-ceramic interfaces were examined using stereomicroscopy. Additionally, 1 specimen from each group was prepared for scanning electron microscopy analysis to evaluate the surface topography of metal frameworks. Results. The mean bond strength was 38.08 +/- 3.82 MPa for group C, 39.29 +/- 3.51 MPa for group M, 40.73 +/- 3.58 MPa for group LS, and 41.24 +/- 3.75 MPa for group LC. Statistically significant differences were observed among the 4 groups (P=.016). All groups, except for LS, exhibited adhesive and mixed type bond failure. Conclusions. Both of the laser sintering methods were found to be successful in terms of metal ceramic bond strength.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.002en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of porcelain bond strength of different metal frameworks prepared by using conventional and recently introduced fabrication methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume118en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage76en_US
dc.identifier.endpage82en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster