Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaleli, Necati
dc.contributor.authorSarac, Duygu
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:19:46Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:19:46Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913
dc.identifier.issn1097-6841
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/12471
dc.descriptionWOS: 000401399600016en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 27881325en_US
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Marginal adaptation plays an important role in the survival of metal ceramic restorations. Porcelain firings and cementation may affect the adaptation of restorations. Moreover, conventional casting procedures and casting imperfections may cause deteriorations in the marginal adaptation of metal-ceramic restorations. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the marginal adaptation after fabrication of the framework, porcelain application, and cementation of metal-ceramic restorations prepared by using the conventional lost-wax technique, milling, direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), and LaserCUSING, a direct process powder-bed system. Alterations in the marginal adaptation of the metal frameworks during the fabrication stages and the precision of fabrication methods were evaluated. Material and methods. Forty-eight metal dies simulating prepared premolar and molar abutment teeth were fabricated to investigate marginal adaptation. They were divided into 4 groups (n=12) according to the fabrication method used (group C serving as the control group: lost-wax method; group M: milling method; group LS: DMLS method; group DP: direct process powder-bed method). Sixty marginal discrepancy measurements were recorded separately on each abutment tooth after fabrication of the framework, porcelain application, and cementation by using a stereomicroscope. Thereafter, each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to the measurements recorded in each fabrication stage: subgroup F (framework), subgroup P (porcelain application), and subgroup C (cementation). Data were statistically analyzed with univariate analysis of variance (followed by 1-way ANOVA and Tamhane T2 test (alpha=.05). Results. The lowest marginal discrepancy values were observed in restorations prepared by using the direct process powder-bed method, and this was significantly different (P<.001) from the other methods. The highest marginal discrepancy values were recorded after the cementation procedure in all groups. Conclusions. The results showed that the direct process powder-bed method is quite successful in terms of marginal adaptation. The marginal discrepancy increased after porcelain application and cementation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.016en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleInfluence of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal adaptation of metal-ceramic restorations prepared by different methodsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume117en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage656en_US
dc.identifier.endpage661en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record