Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCicek, Ersan
dc.contributor.authorOzsezer-Demiryurek, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorOzerol-Keskin, Neslihan Busra
dc.contributor.authorMurat, Naci
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:32:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:32:31Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0020-6539
dc.identifier.issn1875-595X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12222
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13219
dc.descriptionKESKIN, Neslihan Busra/0000-0002-1053-7675en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000380728400002en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 27061179en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectivesTo compare the decision-making choices among Turkish dentists with different educational backgrounds. MethodsEighty endodontically treated teeth were selected from the authors' private archives and placed into four case groups of equal size: case-group 1, symptom/periapical lesion (n = 20); case-group 2, symptom/no periapical lesion (n = 20); case-group 3, no symptom/periapical lesion (n = 20); and case-group 4, no symptom/no periapical lesion (n = 20). The respective periapical radiograph of each tooth was scanned and, together with a leaflet containing relevant information, was distributed to the participants. Participants comprised undergraduate students (n = 20), general dentists (n = 20), endodontic postgraduate students (n = 20) and endodontists (n = 20). Each participant was requested to choose only one option, from five previously determined treatment alternatives, for each tooth: no treatment, wait and see; non-surgical root canal treatment; only apical surgery (apical resection and retrofilling or only apical curettage); retreatment and apical surgery; or extraction. The results were expressed as frequency and percentage. Kendall's W test was used to determine the differences among the participant groups. ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference among the practitioners in the preferred treatment options for different case-groups (P < 0.05). For case-groups 1, 2 and 3, the postgraduate students and endodontists preferred non-surgical retreatment more frequently than did the undergraduate students and general dentists. However, in case-group 4, all participants suggested the first treatment option, no treatment, wait and see' more frequently than the other treatment options. ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this survey study it was concluded that endodontists and graduate programme students tend more towards conservative treatment (retreatment) compared with general dentists and undergraduate students.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/idj.12222en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectClinical decision makingen_US
dc.subjectendodonticsen_US
dc.subjectretreatmenten_US
dc.subjecteducational backgrounden_US
dc.titleComparison of treatment choices among endodontists, postgraduate students, undergraduate students and general dentists for endodontically treated teethen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume66en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage201en_US
dc.identifier.endpage207en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Dental Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster