Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBora, Emre
dc.contributor.authorHidiroglu, Ceren
dc.contributor.authorOzerdem, Aysegul
dc.contributor.authorKacar, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorSarisoy, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Filiz Civil
dc.contributor.authorTumkaya, Selim
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:32:34Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:32:34Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0924-977X
dc.identifier.issn1873-7862
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.04.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13228
dc.descriptionBora, Emre/0000-0002-1598-6832;en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000383340800009en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 27139077en_US
dc.description.abstractBipolar disorder (BP), at the group level, is associated with significant but modest cognitive deficits, including executive dysfunction. Among executive functions, response inhibition deficits have been suggested to be particularly relevant to BR However, BP is associated with significant heterogeneity in neurocognitive performance and level of functioning. Very few studies have investigated neurocognitive subgroups in BP with data-driven methods rather than arbitrarily defined criteria. Other than having relatively small sample sizes, previous studies have not taken into consideration the neurocognitive variability in healthy subjects. Five hundred-fifty-six euthymic patients with BP and 416 healthy controls were assessed using a battery of cognitive tests and clinical measures. Neurocognitive subgroups were investigated using latent class analysis, based on executive functions. Four neurocognitive subgroups, including a good performance cluster, two moderately low-performance groups, which differ in response inhibition and reasoning abilities, and a severe impairment cluster were found. In comparison to healthy controls, BP patients were overrepresented in severe impairment cluster (27% vs 5.3%) and underrepresented in good performance cluster. BP patients with lower educational attainment and older age were significantly more likely to be members of cognitively impaired subgroups. Antipsychotic use was less common in good performance cluster. These results suggest that there is a considerable overlap of cognitive functions between BP and healthy controls. Neurocognitive differences between BP and healthy controls are driven by a subgroup of patients who have severe and global, rather than selective, cognitive deficits. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bven_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.04.002en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBipolar disorderen_US
dc.subjectNeurocognitionen_US
dc.subjectCognitive heterogeneityen_US
dc.subjectLatent class analysisen_US
dc.titleExecutive dysfunction and cognitive subgroups in a large sample of euthymic patients with bipolar disorderen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1338en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1347en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Neuropsychopharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record