Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorHatipoglu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorMutluoglu, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorTurhan, Vedat
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Gunalp
dc.contributor.authorLipsky, Benjamin A.
dc.contributor.authorSevim, Erol
dc.contributor.authorAslaner, Halide
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:32:52Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:32:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1056-8727
dc.identifier.issn1873-460X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.02.013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/13278
dc.descriptionYasar, Kadriye Kart/0000-0003-2963-4894; Gencer, Serap/0000-0002-3217-6305; Uzun, Gunalp/0000-0002-8717-6230; demirdal, tuna/0000-0002-9046-5666; Hosoglu, Salih/0000-0002-4034-9202; ERTURK, AYSE/0000-0001-6413-9165; Lipsky, Benjamin A./0000-0001-9886-5114; yanik yalcin, tugba/0000-0001-5996-8639; hatipoglu, mustafa/0000-0001-9910-1650; altay, fatma aybala/0000-0002-7149-2968; Uysal, Serhat/0000-0002-4294-5999en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000378759700027en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26965794en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: Clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetic foot infections developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) are commonly used worldwide. The issue of whether or not these guidelines need to be adjusted for local circumstances, however, has seldom been assessed in large prospective trials. Methods: The Turk-DAY trial was a prospective, multi-center study in which infectious disease specialists from centers across Turkey were invited to participate (NCT02026830). Results: A total of 35 centers throughout Turkey enrolled patients in the trial. Overall, investigators collected a total of 522 specimens from infected diabetic foot wounds for culture from 447 individual patients. Among all isolates, 36.4% were gram-positive organisms, with Staphylococcus aureus the most common among these (11.4%). Gram-negative organisms constituted 60.2% of all the isolates, and the most commonly isolated gram-negative was Escherichia coli (15%). The sensitivity rates of the isolated species were remarkably low for several antimicrobials used in the mild infection group. Conclusions: Based on our findings, several of the antimicrobials frequently used for empirical treatment, including some also recommended in the IDSA guidelines, would not be optimal for treating diabetic foot infections in Turkey. Although the IDSA guideline recommendations may be helpful to guide empiric antimicrobial therapy of DFIs, they should be adjusted to local conditions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.02.013en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntibiotic therapyen_US
dc.subjectDiabetic footen_US
dc.subjectGuidelineen_US
dc.subjectInfectionen_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.titleCausative pathogens and antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot infections: A prospective multi-center studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage910en_US
dc.identifier.endpage916en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Diabetes and Its Complicationsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster