Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAvsar, Aysun
dc.contributor.authorYuzbasioglu, Emir
dc.contributor.authorSarac, Duygu
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:45:38Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:45:38Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1899-5276
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.17219/acem/23971
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/14140
dc.descriptionyuzbasioglu, emir/0000-0001-5348-6954en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000365969300018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26768641en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground. Rough, poorly polished surfaces contribute to staining, plaque accumulation, gingival irritation and recurrent caries. Finishing and polishing techniques are critical factors contributing to the longevity of the direct composite resin restorations. Objectives. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness of six nanocomposite restorative resins. Material and Methods. Thirty specimens of each restorative material (n = 180) were placed in a teflon mould (6 mm in diameter and 3 mm in depth) and cured with a LED curing unit. Six specimens from each of restorative material were randomly assigned to four groups for finishing and polishing (carbide burs, diamond burs, aluminium oxide discs, silicon rubber polisher) techniques. Mylar strip formed specimens were served as control group. After finishing and polishing procedures surface roughness was evaluated by a profilometer. The data was analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and the Tukey HSD test (alpha = 0.05). Results. Significant differences were found between the groups in terms roughness (p < 0.001). The control group and aluminium oxide discs group had the lowest Ra values and were significantly different from other groups (p < 0.001). The roughest surface was obtained with diamond burs followed by silicon rubbers and carbide burs. Overall, the smoothest surfaces were obtained with the use the complete sequence of aluminum oxide discs. Conclusions. In areas that could not be reached by the aluminum oxide discs, the carbide burs produced satisfactory surface smoothness for the nanocomposite restorative materials. Although mylar matrix strip formed surfaces presents lower surface roughness values, recountouring and polishing of resin restorations are often required in clinical situations. Aluminium oxide discs and carbide finishing burs are suitable for finishing and polishing procedures for nanocomposite restorative resinsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWroclaw Medical Univen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.17219/acem/23971en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectsurface roughnessen_US
dc.subjectcolor differenceen_US
dc.subjectnanocomposite resinsen_US
dc.subjectpolishing techniquesen_US
dc.titleThe Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materialsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage881en_US
dc.identifier.endpage890en_US
dc.relation.journalAdvances in Clinical and Experimental Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster