Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOzlu, Fethiye Cakmak
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorKocak, Mustafa Murat
dc.contributor.authorElekdag-Turk, Selma
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Tamer
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:45:41Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:45:41Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn2528-9659
dc.identifier.issn2148-9505
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00006R2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/14152
dc.descriptionTurk, Tugba/0000-0002-3726-3715en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000439316200001en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the initial shear bond strengths (SBSs) of ceramic brackets using either a self-etching primer (SEP) or the conventional method (CM) after intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate and distilled water. Methods: Eighty human incisors were divided into four groups according to bleaching and bonding procedures: Group 1, bleaching was not applied and the brackets were bonded with a self-etching primer; Group 2, bleaching was not applied and the brackets were bonded with the conventional method; Group 3, intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate was applied for three weeks and the brackets were bonded with a self-etching primer; and Group 4, intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate was applied for three weeks and the brackets were bonded with the conventional method. A self-etching primer (Transbond Plus) was applied as recommended by the manufacturer. After SEP application, the ceramic brackets were bonded with a light-curing adhesive (Transbond XT). For the conventional method, the teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid. After etching, a thin uniform coat of primer (Transbond XT Primer) was applied and the ceramic brackets were bonded with a light-curing adhesive (Transbond XT). SBSs were measured after water storage for 30 days, after 1000 cycles of thermocycling between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C. Bond failure location was determined with the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Results: For the SEP method, there was no significant difference between SBS values of the bleaching and non-bleaching groups. Furthermore, for the conventional method, the SBS value of the non-bleaching group was not significantly different from that of the bleaching group. SBS values of the SEP method presented significant differences from those of the conventional method (p<0.001). SBS values of SEP application decreased with and without bleaching. The ARI scores did not show any significant difference among the groups (p=0.174). Conclusion: Intracoronal bleaching with sodium perborate and distilled water did not affect the SBS values of ceramic brackets.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAves Press Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00006R2en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSelf-etching primeren_US
dc.subjectintracoronal bleachingen_US
dc.subjectceramic bracketsen_US
dc.subjectbond strengthen_US
dc.titleComparison of the Shear Bond Strengths of Ceramic Brackets Using Either a Self-Etching Primer or the Conventional Method after Intracoronal Bleachingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage77en_US
dc.identifier.endpage81en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster