Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDikici, Mustafa Fevzi
dc.contributor.authorYaris, Fusun
dc.contributor.authorIgde, Fusun Artiran
dc.contributor.authorYarar, Fulya
dc.contributor.authorAltuntas, Oznur
dc.contributor.authorGurz, Aysenur Alper
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:57:41Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:57:41Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1682-024X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15256
dc.descriptionDikici, Mustafa Fevzi/0000-0001-7445-5882; Artiran Igde, Fusun/0000-0001-8943-1103en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000334562700016en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 24772132en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed to investigate the effect of rational pharmacotherapy workshop for interns on the rationality, cost and number of drugs prescribed. Methods: The participants were asked to prescribe a medication for acute noninflammatory osteoarthritis (ANOA), acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ARS), acute otitis media (AOM), acute uncomplicated cystitis (AC), and acute bacterial tonsillopharyngitis (ABT) before and after workshop. Total 3000 prescriptions were scored regarding rationality of the drug choice (0-10), format (0-5), instructions (0-4), legibility (0-1) and total (0-20 points). The mean number of drug(s) and total costs per prescription were calculated. Paired samples t-test was used to compare the pre- and post score means. Results: Total pre- and post-prescribing scores (0-20) were significantly different (p=0.00 for each): ANOA (13.59 +/- 0.27, 18.33 +/- 0.18), ARS (13.26 +/- 0.18, 15.15 +/- 0.17), AOM (12.58 +/- 0.26, 14.66 +/- 0.27), AC (13.53 +/- 0.17, 15.76 +/- 0.20), ABT (13.54 +/- 0.24, 15.49 +/- 0.28). Mean number of drugs per prescription for the indications in the pre-test and post-test were: ANOA (1.24 +/- 0.29, 1.02 +/- 0.01, p=0.00), ARS (2.08 +/- 0.04, 2.00 +/- 0.04, p=0.16), AOM (1.66 +/- 0.04 and 1.69 +/- 0.03, p=0.54), AC (1.55 +/- 0.04, 1.39 +/- 0.03, p=0.00) and ABT (2.10 +/- 0.05, 1.81 +/- 0.05, p=0.00). Mean costs per prescription in Turkish Liras: ANOA (6.31 +/- 0.29, 4.60 +/- 0.05, p=0.00), ARS (13.80 +/- 0.38, 4.63 +/- 0.04, p=0.00), AOM (10.18 +/- 0.28, 4.41 +/- 0.07, p=0.00), AC (11.33 +/- 0.21, 10.68 +/- 0.18, p=0.01) and ABT (12.03 +/- 0.34 and 10.41 +/- 0.35, p=0.00). Conclusion: Training produced a significant improvement in rational prescribing.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherProfessional Medical Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectRational drug therapyen_US
dc.subjectFamily medicineen_US
dc.subjectUndergraduate medical educationen_US
dc.titleEffect of a workshop in rational pharmacotherapy for interns during family medicine clerkship in Samsun-Turkeyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage305en_US
dc.identifier.endpage309en_US
dc.relation.journalPakistan Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record