Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCetinkaya, Burcu Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Gonca Cayir
dc.contributor.authorPamuk, Ferda
dc.contributor.authorBalli, Umut
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Zeynep Pinar
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:57:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:57:54Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.issn1502-3850
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2013.775668
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15295
dc.descriptionWOS: 000333047000002en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 24279607en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective. The purpose of this clinical investigation was to evaluate long-term results obtained with the combination of platelet pellet(PP) plus bioabsorbable barriermembrane(BM) and to compare this outcome with the results obtained using bioactive glass (BG) graft material with a BM. Materials and methods. Using a split mouth design, 11 chronic periodontitis patients (power >= at least 80%) were randomly assigned to treatment with a combination of PP/GTR or BG/GTR in contra-lateral dentition areas. Clinical attachment level (CAL) as the primary outcome variable, calculated as the sum of probing pocket depth (PPD) and gingival recession, and radiological alveolar bone level were recorded at baseline, 6 months and 5 years. Results. There were no statistical differences between test and control defects at baseline. PPD reductions and CAL and radiological alveolar bone height gains were statistically significant between baseline and 6 months and between baseline and 5 years in both groups (p<0.01). Six months results of frequency distribution showed that 82% of the defects attained >= 4 mm CAL gain in both groups, while 5 year results showed that 73% of the defects attained 2 mm <= CAL gain < 4 mm in the PP/BM group and 55% of the defects attained 2 mm <= CAL gain < 4 mm in the BG/BM group. All parameters evaluated showed no significant differences between 6 months and 5 years in both groups (p > 0.05). No statistically significant difference in any of the clinical parameters was observed at 6 months and 5 years between the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions. The long-term efficacy of platelet concentrate combined with a barrier membrane is similar with the combination of bioactive glass graft material and barrier membrane, suggesting that results obtained with both treatment approaches can be maintained over a period of 5 years.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.3109/00016357.2013.775668en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectbone graften_US
dc.subjectguided tissue regenerationen_US
dc.subjectlong-termen_US
dc.subjectplatelet-rich plasmaen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.titleLong-term clinical results on the use of platelet concentrate in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defectsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume72en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage92en_US
dc.identifier.endpage98en_US
dc.relation.journalActa Odontologica Scandinavicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record