Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlici, Omer
dc.contributor.authorKefeli, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Levent
dc.contributor.authorBaris, Sancar
dc.contributor.authorKaragoz, Filiz
dc.contributor.authorKandemir, Bedri
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:58:25Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:58:25Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn0344-0338
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.07.003
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15372
dc.descriptionWOS: 000346454200025en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 25155376en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to compare the expressions of fascin and EMMPRIN in primary malignant, borderline and benign mucinous ovarian tumors, and to investigate the relationship of these markers with tumor progression and their applicability to differential diagnosis. Materials and methods: An immunohistochemical study was performed for fascin and EMMPRIN using the tissue microarray technique. Eighty-one cases were included in the study; there were 37 benign, 25 borderline and 19 malignant primary mucinous ovarian tumors. For each case, a total staining score was determined, consisting of scores for extent of staining and intensity of staining. The cases were allocated to negative, weakly positive and strongly positive staining categories, according to the total staining score. Results: Both of the markers were significantly negative in benign tumors as compared with borderline and malignant tumors. There was no significant difference between borderline and malignant groups for both markers. Sixty-eight percent of malignant tumors were stained positive by fascin, while this rate was 40% for borderline mucinous tumors. All malignant tumors were strongly stained positive for EMMPRIN, while this rate was 92% for borderline mucinous tumors. The rest of the cases stained weakly positive. No significant difference in staining score was found between fascin and EMMPRIN expression. Conclusions: In ovarian primary mucinous tumors, fascin and EMMPRIN may play an important role in tumor progression from benign tumor to carcinoma. In that context, EMMPRIN and fascin expression may have potential application in the differential diagnosis of some diagnostically problematic mucinous ovarian tumors. However, the differential diagnostic applicability of EMMPRIN appears to be more limited than that of fascin due to Its wide spectrum of staining in mucinous ovarian tumors. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlagen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.prp.2014.07.003en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMucinous tumoren_US
dc.subjectOvaryen_US
dc.subjectFascinen_US
dc.subjectEMMPRINen_US
dc.subjectTissue microarrayen_US
dc.titleFascin and EMMPRIN expression in primary mucinous tumors of ovary: A tissue microarray studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume210en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage934en_US
dc.identifier.endpage938en_US
dc.relation.journalPathology Research and Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record