Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSoylu, Korhan
dc.contributor.authorGulel, Okan
dc.contributor.authorMeric, Murat
dc.contributor.authorZengin, Halit
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorDemircan, Sabri
dc.contributor.authorYasar, Erdogan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:04:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:04:50Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1918-1515
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15724
dc.descriptionWOS: 000340731300002en_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION: In patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to be superior to thrombolytic therapy for the restoration of normal coronary blood flow. However, depending on the technique used, no-reflow phenomenon is observed in some of these patients. METHODS: Data from 385 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI were evaluated. The coronary angiograms of the patients were reviewed. Thrombosis In Myocardial Infarction flow grades, corrected Thrombosis In Myocardial Infarction frame count (cTFC) values and degree of stenosis were measured before intervention using quantitative coronary angiography, after angioplasty and after stenting. Patients were divided into four groups according to the degrees of residual stenosis (RS) and cTFC values after angioplasty: group I (n=82, RS <50% and cTFC <28 frames), group II (n=50, RS >= 50% and cTFC <28 frames), group III (n=40, RS <50% and cTFC >= 28 frames), and group IV (n=46, RS >= 50% and cTFC >= 28 frames). RESULTS: In group I, the cTFC values were significantly higher after stenting than after angioplasty (21.8 +/- 8.9 frames versus 18.6 +/- 4.9 frames; P=0.02); on the other hand, in group IV cTFC values were significantly lower after stenting than after angioplasty (49.3 +/- 31.4 frames versus 63.8 +/- 27.4 frames; P=0.037). The cTFC values were similar after angioplasty and after stenting in groups II and III (19.6 +/- 5.0 frames versus 20.4 +/- 11.3 frames; P=0.37, and 57.8 +/- 26.9 frames versus 55.5 +/- 31.6 frames; P=0.433, respectively). CONCLUSION: Routine stent implantation during primary PCI is an effective way to reduce residual stenosis in patients with STEMI. However, it may be logical that the decision for immediate stent implantation during primary PCI should be made taking the results of angioplasty into consideration.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCardiology Academic Pressen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDirect stentingen_US
dc.subjectPrimary angioplastyen_US
dc.subjectSTEMIen_US
dc.subjectTIMI flowen_US
dc.titleThe impact of stenting on coronary blood flow in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.relation.journalExperimental & Clinical Cardiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record