Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaradeniz, Ersan I.
dc.contributor.authorGonzales, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorIsci, Devrim
dc.contributor.authorSahin-Saglam, Aynur M.
dc.contributor.authorAlkis, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorDarendeliler, M. Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:05:47Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:05:47Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2319/072512-606.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15879
dc.descriptionKaradeniz, Carmen/0000-0003-2371-9037; Karadeniz, Carmen B/0000-0003-2371-9037; Darendeliler, Mehmet Ali/0000-0002-8906-8153; Elekdag-Turk, Selma/0000-0002-2799-6501; Karadeniz, Ersan/0000-0001-7652-0801en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000318210500008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 23145973en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the null hypothesis that fluoride intake via drinking water has no effect on orthodontic root resorption in humans after orthodontic force application for 4 weeks and 12 weeks of retention. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight patients who required maxillary premolar extractions as part of their orthodontic treatment were selected from two cities in Turkey. These cities had a high and low fluoride concentration in public water of >= 2 pm and <= 0.05 pm, respectively. The patients were randomly separated into four groups of 12 each: group 1HH, high fluoride (>= 2 ppm) and heavy force (225 g); group 2LH, low fluoride (<= 0.05 ppm) and heavy force; group 3HL, high fluoride and light force (25 g); and group 4LL, low fluoride and light force. Light or heavy buccal tipping force was applied on the upper first premolars for 28 days. At day 28, the left premolars were extracted (positive control side); the right premolars (experimental side) were extracted after 12 weeks of retention. The samples were analyzed with microconnputed tomography. Results: On the positive control side, under heavy force application, the high fluoride groups exhibited less root resorption (P = .015). On the experimental side, it was found that fluoride reduced the total volume of root resorption craters; however, this effect was not statistically significant (P = .237). Moreover, the results revealed that under heavy force application experimental teeth exhibited more root resorption than positive control groups. Conclusion: The null hypothesis could not be rejected. High fluoride intake from public water did not have a beneficial effect on the severity of root resorption after a 4-week orthodontic force application and 12 weeks of passive retention. (Angle Orthod. 2013;83:418-424.)en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.2319/072512-606.1en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFluorideen_US
dc.subjectRoot resorptionen_US
dc.subjectMicro-CTen_US
dc.titleEffect of fluoride on root resorption following heavy and light orthodontic force application for 4 weeks and 12 weeks of retentionen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume83en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage418en_US
dc.identifier.endpage424en_US
dc.relation.journalAngle Orthodontisten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record