Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ahmet Umut
dc.contributor.authorSumer, Mahmut
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorSandikci, Elif Ozen
dc.contributor.authorTelcioglu, Nazife Tuba
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:05:58Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:05:58Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn0160-6972
dc.identifier.issn1548-1336
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00060
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15902
dc.descriptionWOS: 000318202000007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 22103915en_US
dc.description.abstractThe most important prerequisite for the success of an osseointegrated dental implant is achievement and maintenance of implant stability. The aim of the study was to measure the 208 Straumann dental implant stability quotient (ISQ) values during the osseointegration period and determine the factors that affect implant stability. A total of 164 of the implants inserted were standard surface, and 44 of them were SLActive surface. To determine implant stability as ISQ values, measurements were performed at the stage of implant placement and healing periods by the Osstell mentor. The ISQ value ranges showed a significant increase during the healing period. Except for the initial measurement, the posterior maxilla had the lowest ISQ values, and there was no significant difference among anterior mandible, posterior mandible, and anterior maxilla (P <.05). Implant length did not have a significant influence on ISQ value (P >.05). The second measurement was significantly higher in men compared with women (P <.05). The second measurement was significantly higher than the others at 4.8 mm, and for the final measurement, there were no significant differences between 4.8 and 4.1 mm, which were higher than 3.3 mm (P <.05). When comparing sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) and SLActive surface implants, there were no significant differences for insertion measurements, but for second measurements, SLActive was significantly higher (P =0), and for the final measurement, there was no significant difference. It appears that repeated ISQ measurements of a specific implant have some diagnostic benefit, and the factors that affect implant stability during the healing period are presented.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOndokuz Mayis University Research FundOndokuz Mayis University [DHF 054]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by Ondokuz Mayis University Research Fund (project No. DHF 054).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAllen Press Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00060en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectimplant stabilityen_US
dc.subjectISQ valueen_US
dc.subjectresonance frequency analysisen_US
dc.subjectStrauman dental implanten_US
dc.titleResonance Frequency Analysis of 208 Straumann Dental Implants During the Healing Perioden_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume39en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage161en_US
dc.identifier.endpage168en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Oral Implantologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record