Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorPazvantoglu, Ozan
dc.contributor.authorAlgul, Ayhan
dc.contributor.authorAtes, Mehmet Alpay
dc.contributor.authorSarisoy, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorEbrinc, Servet
dc.contributor.authorBasoglu, Cengiz
dc.contributor.authorCetin, Mesut
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:06:41Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:06:41Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1017-7833
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20130127020802
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/15987
dc.descriptionCetin, Mesut/0000-0002-6378-5701en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000339982600010en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: One of the aims of this study was to investigate whether or not patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) differ from healthy controls in terms of their dysfunctional metacognitions. Another aim was to investigate the relationship between obsessive-compulsive (O-C) symptom types and subdimensions of metacognition. Methods: Fifty-two patients diagnosed with OCD and 65 healthy controls were evaluated using the Metacognitions Questionaire-30 (MCQ-30). Scale scores were compared using the Student-t test, and effect sizes of statistical significance were calculated. Additionally, the, Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms Inventory (MOCI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) were applied, and the correlations between the scores from these scales and the MCQ-30 were tested using Pearson correlation analysis. Results: MCQ-30 total scores in OCD patients compared to healthy controls were higher to a medium degree (p<0.0001, effect size=0.74)."Uncontrollability and danger" (p<0.0001, effect size=0.95), and "need to control thoughts" (p<0.0001, effect size=0.84) subscales were higher in patients with OCD patients with a large effect size. The highest correlations between subscales of MCQ-30 and MOCI scores were between "doubt/indecisiveness" symptom type scores and "uncontrollability and danger" (r=0.48) and "need to control thoughts" (r=0.47) subscale scores. In addition, the highest correlations between BAI score and subscales of these scales (MCQ-30 and MOO) were between the same subscales (respectively; r =0.46, r =0.55, r=0.66). Conclusions: Dysfunctional metacognitions were quite high in OCD patients. Certain metacognition subdimensions ("uncontrollability and danger" and "need to control thoughts") are of central importance in OCD. Some obsessive compulsive symptom types ("doubt/indecisiveness") exhibit a more common and substantial relationship with these metacognitions. Our study is the first to investigate the relationship between OCD and metacognitions in Turkey and may contribute to a better understanding of metacognitive processes in OCD patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKure Iletisim Grubu A Sen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5455/bcp.20130127020802en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectObsessive compulsive disorderen_US
dc.subjectmetacognitionen_US
dc.subjectMCQ-30en_US
dc.subjectsubdimensions of metacognitionen_US
dc.subjectTurkish sampleen_US
dc.titleMetacognitive Functions in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder in a Turkish Clinical Population: the Relationship Between Symptom Types and Metacognition Subdimensionsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage65en_US
dc.identifier.endpage71en_US
dc.relation.journalKlinik Psikofarmakoloji Bulteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster