dc.contributor.author | Tuzuner, Tamer | |
dc.contributor.author | Ulusoy, Ayca Tuba | |
dc.contributor.author | Baygin, Ozgul | |
dc.contributor.author | Yahyaoglu, Gorkem | |
dc.contributor.author | Yalcin, Ilkay | |
dc.contributor.author | Buruk, Kurtulus | |
dc.contributor.author | Nicholson, John | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T14:16:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T14:16:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1011-7571 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1423-0151 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1159/000347234 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/16112 | |
dc.description | WOS: 000322526200015 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed: 23485568 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To evaluate the direct and transdentinal (indirect) agar diffusion antibacterial activity of different commercially available antibacterial dental gel formulations against Streptococcus mutans. Materials and Methods: The commercially available dental gel formulations were Corsodyl (R) (COG, 1% chlorhexidine), Cervitec (R) (CEG, 0.2% chlorhexidine + 0.2% sodium fluoride), Forever Bright (R) (FOB, aloe vera), Gengigel (R) (GEG, 0.2% hyaluronic acid), 35% phosphoric acid gel and distilled water (control). Direct agar diffusion was performed by isolating three wells from brain-heart infusion agar plates using sterile glass pipettes attached to a vacuum pump and adding 0.1 ml of the gels to each well. Transdentinal (indirect) agar diffusion was performed by applying gel to 0.2- and 0.5-mm-thick human dentin discs previously etched with phosphoric acid and rinsed with distilled water. Zones formed around the wells and the dentin discs were measured and analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.01). Results: Direct agar diffusion tests showed significant differences among all gel formulations (p < 0.01) except for COG and CEG (p > 0.01). COG and CEG exhibited higher antibacterial effects compared to FOB and GEG (p < 0.01) in both direct and transdentinal (indirect) testing procedures. GEG did not show any antimicrobial activity in transdentinal (indirect) testing. Conclusion: Commercially available dental gels inhibited S. mutans, which may indicate their potential as cavity disinfectants. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Karger | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1159/000347234 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Antibacterial dental gels | en_US |
dc.subject | Streptococcus mutans | en_US |
dc.subject | Cavity disinfectant | en_US |
dc.subject | Chlorhexidine | en_US |
dc.subject | Aloe vera | en_US |
dc.subject | Hyaluronic acid | en_US |
dc.title | Direct and Transdentinal (Indirect) Antibacterial Activity of Commercially Available Dental Gel Formulations against Streptococcus mutans | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 22 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 397 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 401 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Medical Principles and Practice | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |