Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTuzuner, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, Ayca Tuba
dc.contributor.authorBaygin, Ozgul
dc.contributor.authorYahyaoglu, Gorkem
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Ilkay
dc.contributor.authorBuruk, Kurtulus
dc.contributor.authorNicholson, John
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:16:42Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:16:42Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1011-7571
dc.identifier.issn1423-0151
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000347234
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/16112
dc.descriptionWOS: 000322526200015en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 23485568en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the direct and transdentinal (indirect) agar diffusion antibacterial activity of different commercially available antibacterial dental gel formulations against Streptococcus mutans. Materials and Methods: The commercially available dental gel formulations were Corsodyl (R) (COG, 1% chlorhexidine), Cervitec (R) (CEG, 0.2% chlorhexidine + 0.2% sodium fluoride), Forever Bright (R) (FOB, aloe vera), Gengigel (R) (GEG, 0.2% hyaluronic acid), 35% phosphoric acid gel and distilled water (control). Direct agar diffusion was performed by isolating three wells from brain-heart infusion agar plates using sterile glass pipettes attached to a vacuum pump and adding 0.1 ml of the gels to each well. Transdentinal (indirect) agar diffusion was performed by applying gel to 0.2- and 0.5-mm-thick human dentin discs previously etched with phosphoric acid and rinsed with distilled water. Zones formed around the wells and the dentin discs were measured and analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.01). Results: Direct agar diffusion tests showed significant differences among all gel formulations (p < 0.01) except for COG and CEG (p > 0.01). COG and CEG exhibited higher antibacterial effects compared to FOB and GEG (p < 0.01) in both direct and transdentinal (indirect) testing procedures. GEG did not show any antimicrobial activity in transdentinal (indirect) testing. Conclusion: Commercially available dental gels inhibited S. mutans, which may indicate their potential as cavity disinfectants. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Baselen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1159/000347234en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntibacterial dental gelsen_US
dc.subjectStreptococcus mutansen_US
dc.subjectCavity disinfectanten_US
dc.subjectChlorhexidineen_US
dc.subjectAloe veraen_US
dc.subjectHyaluronic aciden_US
dc.titleDirect and Transdentinal (Indirect) Antibacterial Activity of Commercially Available Dental Gel Formulations against Streptococcus mutansen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage397en_US
dc.identifier.endpage401en_US
dc.relation.journalMedical Principles and Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record