Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDeveci, Aydin
dc.contributor.authorCoban, Ahmet Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorAcicbe, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorTanyel, Esra
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Gorkem
dc.contributor.authorDurupinar, Belma
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:17:47Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1120-009X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1179/1973947812Y.0000000029
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/16331
dc.descriptionWOS: 000309262100001en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 23182043en_US
dc.description.abstractTreatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii infections causes some problems as a result of possessing various antibacterial resistance mechanisms against available antibiotics. Combination of antibiotics, acting by different mechanisms, is used for the treatment of MDR bacterial infections. It is an important factor to determine synergy or antagonism between agents in the combination for the constitution of effective therapy. The study aimed to determine in vitro interactions interpreted according to calculated fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index between sulbactam and ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, meropenem, tigecycline, and colistin. Ten clinical isolates of A. baumannii were tested for determination of synergistic effects of sulbactam with different antimicrobial combinations. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of both sulbactam and combined antibiotics decreased 2- to 128-fold. Synergy and partial synergy were determined in combination of sulbactam with ceftazidime and gentamicin (FIC index: <= 0.5 or >0.5 to <1) and MIC values of both ceftazidime and gentamicin for five isolates fell down below the susceptibility break point. Similarly, MIC value of ciprofloxacin for six ciprofloxacin resistant isolates was determined as below the susceptibility break point in combination. However, all isolates were susceptible to colistin and tigecycline, MIC values of both were decreased in combination with sulbactam. Although synergistic and partial synergistic effects were observed in the combination of sulbactam and ceftriaxone, all isolates remained resistant to ceftriaxone. The effect of cefepime-sulbactam combination was synergy in five, partial synergy in one and indifferent in four isolates. Meropenem and sulbactam showed a partial synergistic effect (FIC index: >0.5 to <1) in three, an additive effect (FIC index: 1) in one and an indifferent effect (FIC index: >1-2) in six isolates. Antagonism was not determined in any combination for clinical A. baumannii isolates in the study. In conclusion, sulbactam is a good candidate for combination treatment regimes for MDR A. baumannii infections.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherManey Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1179/1973947812Y.0000000029en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectA. baumanniien_US
dc.subjectMDRen_US
dc.subjectSynergyen_US
dc.subjectSulbactamen_US
dc.titleIn vitro effects of sulbactam combinations with different antibiotic groups against clinical Acinetobacter baumannii isolatesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage247en_US
dc.identifier.endpage252en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Chemotherapyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record