Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorSenayli, Yesim
dc.contributor.authorOzyurt, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorErkorkmaz, Unal
dc.contributor.authorBostan, Bora
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:18:32Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:18:32Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn0022-4804
dc.identifier.issn1095-8673
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/16438
dc.descriptionOZYURT, Huseyin/0000-0003-2327-4082; Erkorkmaz, Unal/0000-0002-8497-4704en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000306488700039en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 22261588en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose. This experimental study aimed to investigate the antioxidant effects of propofol anesthesia at induction doses in a rat skeletal muscle ischemia/reperfusion injury model. Methods. Twenty-six rats were randomly divided into three groups to receive one of the following interventions: sham operation (n = 6), ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury (n = 10), or propofol administration in addition to I/R injury (n [ 10). I/R injury was attained by 2-h clamping of femoral artery followed by 3-h perfusion. Then blood and tissue samples were collected for biochemical analysis and histopathologic examination. Glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activities and nitric oxide (NO) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were measured in both plasma and muscle tissue. In addition, catalase (CAT) activity and protein carbonyl (PC) content were measured in muscle tissue. Results. I/R group had significantly higher SOD activity (9.05 versus 5.63 and 6.18 U/mL, P < 0.05) and NO level (46.77 versus 30.62 and 33.90 mmol/L, P < 0.05) compared with sham-operated group and I/R plus propofol group. In addition, GSH-Px activity of the I/R group was significantly higher than sham-operated group (1.26 versus 1.05 U/mL, P < 0.05). I/R group had significantly higher tissue activities of CAT (0.11 versus 0.06 and 0.04 k/g protein, P < 0.05) and SOD (0.12 versus 0.08 and 0.07 U/mg protein, P < 0.05) compared with the sham and I/R plus propofol group. Histopathologic examination showed that I/R plus propofol group had significantly lower degeneration (P = 0.021) and inflammation (P = 0.028) scores compared with I/R group. Conclusion. Propofol anesthesia seems to enhance the antioxidant capacity against tourniquet induced ischemia-reperfusion injury. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAcademic Press Inc Elsevier Scienceen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.032en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectpropofolen_US
dc.subjectanesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectreperfusion injuryen_US
dc.subjectantioxidanten_US
dc.subjectskeletal muscleen_US
dc.titleAntioxidant Effects of Propofol on Tourniquet-Induced Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: An Experimental Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume176en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage601en_US
dc.identifier.endpage607en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Surgical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster