Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Mithat
dc.contributor.authorGuvenc, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorYildiz, Levent
dc.contributor.authorAksoy, Abdurrahman
dc.contributor.authorTander, Burak
dc.contributor.authorBlcakci, Unal
dc.contributor.authorBernay, Ferit
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:27:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:27:50Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1300-0292
dc.identifier.issn2146-9040
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2011-22902
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/16569
dc.descriptionAksoy, Abdurrahman/0000-0001-9486-312X;en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000305320400006en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Many substances have been used up to date in order to prevent postoperative adhesions. This problem is still a 'puzzle' for researchers. We aimed to compare various substances preventing adhesions in an experimental postoperative adhesion model. Material and Methods: A total of 35 female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups containing equal number of animals. After laparatomy, peritoneum and ceacum were brushed using a tooth brush until punctate hemorrhage was seen. Additional surgery was not applied in control group (group 1). In the other groups, polyethylene dioxide+sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (PEO+CMC) (group 2), hyaluronan. (HA) (group 3), octenidine dihydrochloride+fenoxyethanol 2% (ODH+FE) (group 4) and surfactant. (SFT) (group 5) were applied respectively, in order to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions. Rats were sacrificed on 10(th) day. Adhesion scores, fibroblastic activity and periserosal inflammation were determined and hydroxyproline (HP) levels were measured using HPLC method. Results: Adhesion and fibroblastic activity scores of group 1 (control) were found significantly higher than the other groups (except ODH+FE group). The lowest adhesion score and hydroxyproline level were found in PEO+CMC group (p<0.05). The lowest fibroblastic acitvity and periserosal inflammation were found in SET group, and it was significantly different from group 1. Periserosal inflammation was significantly higher in ODH group compared to the other groups (p<0.05). Adhesion score of PEO+CMC group was significantly lower than the other groups. Conclusion: All these substances have anti-adhesive effects to some extent. ODH+FE causes irritation to intestinal serosa and has mild anti-adhesive effect. SET was the least irritative among all the substances tested. PEO+CMC seems to be the strongest anti-adhesive substance. This study supports the positive reports on the clinical use of PME+CMS and HA. Particularly, SFT is found to be effective against intra-abdominal adhesions. However, ODH+FE should be further investigated in diluted concentrations.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.publisherOrtadogu Ad Pres & Publ Coen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5336/medsci.2011-22902en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAbdominal cavityen_US
dc.subjectabdominal painen_US
dc.subjecttissue adhesionsen_US
dc.titleComparison of Substances Used for Prevention of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions: An Experimental Study in Ratsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage337en_US
dc.identifier.endpage345en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkiye Klinikleri Tip Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record