Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorUlus, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorTander, Berna
dc.contributor.authorAkyol, Yesim
dc.contributor.authorDurmus, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorBuyukakincak, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorGul, Ulku
dc.contributor.authorKuru, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:27:53Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn1756-1841
dc.identifier.issn1756-185X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-185X.2012.01709.x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/16588
dc.descriptionWOS: 000302060600018en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 22462424en_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this trial was to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of ultrasound (US) therapy on pain, physical function, ambulation activity, disability and psychological status in patients with knee OA. Methods: Forty-two inpatients with bilateral knee OA were randomized by an independent researcher not involved in the data assessment, to receive either therapeutic continuous US (group 1) or sham US (group 2). A 1-MHz US head was used, set to an intensity of 1 W/cm(2) for 10 min. All patients received 20 min of hot packs, 10 min of interferential current, and 15 min of quadriceps isometric exercise of both knees. Patients in each group received treatments five times weekly for 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the treatment sessions. Outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), 50-m walking speed, Lequesne index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: The patients with knee OA had significant improvements in pain, stiffness, functional activity, walking time, disability, depression and anxiety scores with therapeutic US and sham US (P < 0.05). The improvement in pain VAS scores, WOMAC scores, Lequesne index and HADS scores were not significantly different in patients treated with US and sham US (P > 0.05). No side-effects were reported during or after the US treatment periods. Conclusion: US therapy is safe but use of US in addition to conventional physical therapy programs seems to have no further significant effect in people with knee OA.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1111/j.1756-185X.2012.01709.xen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectdepressionen_US
dc.subjectdisabilityen_US
dc.subjectknee osteoarthritisen_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.subjecttherapeutic ultrasounden_US
dc.titleTherapeutic ultrasound versus sham ultrasound for the management of patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage197en_US
dc.identifier.endpage206en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Journal of Rheumatic Diseasesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster