Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaynar, Aynur
dc.contributor.authorKelsaka, Ebru
dc.contributor.authorKarakaya, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorSungur, Metin
dc.contributor.authorBaris, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorDemirkaya, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorBaysal, Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:39:49Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:39:49Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1053-0770
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2010.09.024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17101
dc.descriptionWOS: 000294793800010en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 21109462en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective:The present study aimed to compare 2 different doses of remifentanil infusion on hemodynamics, recovery period, and complications in children undergoing diagnostic pediatric cardiac catheterization. Design: A prospective study. Setting: A university hospital. Participants: Children undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization (n = 60). Interventions: Children (2-12 years of age) scheduled for elective diagnostic cardiac catheterization under sedation were included in this study. The patients were ssigned randomly to 2 groups as follows: patients in group 1 (n = 30) received a remifentanil infusion of 0.1 mu g/kg/min, and patients in group 2 (n = 30) received a remifentanil infusion of 0.2 mu g/kg/min. Heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressures (BPs), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), respiratory rate (RR), sedation, and recovery scores were recorded. Measurements and Main Results: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of systolic and diastolic BPs, HR, SpO(2), and RR during the study period. Additional drugs were required for 15 children in group 1; however, 27 patients maintained a satisfactory level of sedation with the 0.2-mu g/kg/min remifentanil infusion. The time to achieve a recovery score of >= 5 was significantly shorter in group 2 than in group 1(4.1 +/- 0.3 minutes v 6.8 +/- 0.8 minutes). No postoperative complications were reported in either group. Conclusion: After oral midazolam premedication and local prilocaine infiltration, 0.2 mu g/kg/min of remifentanil provided adequate sedation without any hemodynamic compromise during pediatric diagnostic cardiac catheterization. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Committee of Ondokuzmayis UniversityOndokuz Mayis Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSupported by the Research Committee of Ondokuzmayis University.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1053/j.jvca.2010.09.024en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectremifentanil doseen_US
dc.subjectpediatric diagnostic cardiac catheterizationen_US
dc.subjectsedationen_US
dc.titleEffects of Different Doses of Remifentanil Infusion on Hemodynamics and Recovery in Children Undergoing Pediatric Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterizationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage660en_US
dc.identifier.endpage664en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster