Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMisir, Ahmet Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorManisali, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorEgrioglu, Erol
dc.contributor.authorNaini, Farhad B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:40:00Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:40:00Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn0278-2391
dc.identifier.issn1531-5053
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/17155
dc.descriptionEgrioglu, Erol/0000-0003-4301-4149en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000291404000032en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 21367507en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the changes in the position of the nasal and labial soft tissue profile of patients undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, with special emphasis on the effect on the nasal tip projection. Materials and Methods: The lateral cephalometric radiographs of 27 consecutive patients (16 female and 11 male patients; mean age, 22 years) who had undergone maxillary advancement and mandibular setback were studied. The pretreatment and end-of-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected. The pretreatment and end-of-treatment radiographs were superimposed on the sella-nasion plane, and the case was only included if there had been no change in sella-nasion length (ie, no growth). Analyses of Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise linear regression tests were used to compare the cephalometric measurements at the beginning and at the end of treatment. Paired-sample t tests were also performed to analyze changes in nasolabial angle (NLA) and columella-lobular angle (CLA). Results: The correlations between vertical movement of nasal tip, A-point, and maxillary incisal tip were important. Although there was an important correlation between nasal and incisal tip, interestingly, there was no correlation between nasal tip and A-point in horizontal movement. According to stepwise linear regression analysis, the best model for horizontal movement of nasal tip was as follows: Nasal anteroposterior movement = 0.241 + 0.188 x Incisal tip anteroposterior movement + 0.153 x Incisal tip superoinferior movement. For vertical movement of nasal tip, the best model was as follows: Nasal superoinferior movement = -1.117 + 0.399 x Incisal tip superoinferior movement + 0.323 x A-point anteroposterior movement. There was no significant relation in angular measurements of NLA and CLA before and after treatment. Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that both horizontal and vertical movements of nasal tip were related to incisal tip and A-point movements; however, angular changes in CLA and NLA did not affect the nasal tip. (C) 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:e190-e194, 2011en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-Elsevier Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.joms.2010.10.032en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleRetrospective Analysis of Nasal Soft Tissue Profile Changes With Maxillary Surgeryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE190en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE194en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record