Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBilgici, A.
dc.contributor.authorUlusoy, H.
dc.contributor.authorKuru, O.
dc.contributor.authorCanturk, F.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:52:55Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:52:55Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn0006-9248
dc.identifier.issn1336-0345
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18148
dc.descriptionWOS: 000286355200008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 21384736en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound treatment to local corticosteroid injection plus splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There is still limited knowledge on the efficacy of conservative treatment options for CTS. Methods: Fourty-nine hands of 34 patients with CTS were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to the ultrasound treatment (group A) or local corticosteroid injection plus splinting (group B). The primary outcome measures included clinical parameters such as symptoms severity score, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, functional status score, grip strength and two-point discrimination. The secondary outcome measures were the electrophysiological tests. The examinations were performed at baseline, and then at 4th and 8th weeks. Results: At the end of the study, a statistically significant improvement was obtained in all clinical parameters in the group B: VAS pain, severity of symptoms, functional status, grip strength (p<0.001 for each) and two-point discrimination (p<0.016). Also the group A showed significant improvements in all clinical parameters (p<0.001 for each), except for the grip strength. Additionally, significant improvements in the median nerve sensory conduction velocity and distal motor latency were also found in both groups at the end of the 8 week follow-up period. There was no significant difference between the groups in the primary and secondary outcome measures, except for the grip strength. Conclusions: Both ultrasound treatment and corticosteroid injection plus splinting were effective on the clinical symptoms and the electrophysiological findings of CTS. Thus, the ultrasound therapy may be an alternative treatment for CTS, particularly in patient who do not accept injection or splinting (Tab. 3, Fig. 2, Ref. 36). Full Text in free PDF www.bmj.sk.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherComenius Univen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcarpal tunnel syndromeen_US
dc.subjectsplintingen_US
dc.subjectcorticosteroid injectionen_US
dc.subjectultrasound treatmenten_US
dc.titleThe comparison of ultrasound treatment and local steroid injection plus splinting in the carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume111en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage659en_US
dc.identifier.endpage665en_US
dc.relation.journalBratislava Medical Journal-Bratislavske Lekarske Listyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record