Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYee, Jason A.
dc.contributor.authorTurk, Tamer
dc.contributor.authorElekdag-Turk, Selma
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Lam L.
dc.contributor.authorDarendeliler, M. Ali
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T14:55:13Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T14:55:13Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0889-5406
dc.identifier.issn1097-6752
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.027
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18506
dc.descriptionElekdag-Turk, Selma/0000-0002-2799-6501; Darendeliler, Mehmet Ali/0000-0002-8906-8153en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000268625800008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19651334en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The aim of this study was to measure the rate and the amount of orthodontically induced tooth movement under heavy (300 g) and light (50 g) continuous forces with superelastic nickel-titanium closing coils over a defined time (12 weeks). Methods: Fourteen patients who required maxillary canine retraction into first premolar extraction sites as part of their orthodontic treatment completed this study. In a split-mouth design, precalibrated nickel-titanium closing coil springs delivering a force of 300 g or 50 g were used to distalize the canines after an alignment and stabilization period. Intraoral and maxillary cast measurements were made at the beginning of canine retraction (T0) and every 28 days for 84 days (T1, T2, T3) to assess total space closure, canine retraction rate, canine retraction and molar anchorage loss, and canine rotation. Results: Statistical analysis showed that the amount of initial tooth movement (T0-T1) was not related to force magnitude; however, during the T1-T2 and T2-T3 periods, increased amounts and higher rates of tooth movement were found with heavy forces. These significantly increased the rate and the amount of canine retraction, but the adverse effects of loss of canine rotation control and anchorage were concomitantly increased. Light forces provided a greater percentage of canine retraction than heavy forces, with less strain on anchorage. Conclusions: Initial tooth movement would benefit from light forces. Heavier forces tend to increase the rate and the amount of canine retraction but lose their advantage because of unwanted clinical side effects. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:150.e1-150.e9)en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.027en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleRate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forcesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume136en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedicsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record