Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBulucu, Bilinc
dc.contributor.authorAvsar, Aysun
dc.contributor.authorDemiryurek, Ebru Ozsezer
dc.contributor.authorYesilyurt, Cemal
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:06:14Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:06:14Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn1461-5185
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18521
dc.descriptionYesilyurt, Cemal/0000-0001-5435-9009en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000269255600008en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19701512en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy on the microleakage of three adhesive systems: a one-step self-etching, a two-step self-etching, and an etch-and-rinse system. Materials and Methods: Box-shaped Class V cavity preparations were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 84 extracted human molars. The molars were randomly assigned into 6 groups (n = 14) according to the irradiation and adhesive system as follows: G1, Clearfil S3 Bond (irradiated); G2, Clearfil SE Bond (irradiated); G3, Prime & Bond NT (irradiated); G4, Clearfil S(3) Bond (nonirradiated); G5, Clearfil SE Bond (nonirradiated); and G6, Prime & Bond NT (nonirradiated). The cavities were restored with composite resin (Filtek Z 250). After restoration of the samples, a total dose of 60 Gy was delivered in 2 Gy/d fractions for 5 days per week for 6 weeks for the related groups. All specimens were thermocycled for 200 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C using a dwell time of 60 s in each bath and then placed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 24 In at room temperature. Specimens were then rinsed and sectioned; the dye penetration at the enamel and dentin margins was examined using a stereomicroscope, and a score of 0 to 3 was assigned. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Results: No statistically significant difference existed between the irradiated and nonirradiated groups (p > 0.05). Significant differences in microleakage were observed between enamel and dentin (p < 0.01). The microleakage at the dentin margins was greater than at the enamel margins. Prime & Bond NT revealed statistically significantly (p < 0.05) higher leakage scores in dentin than did ClearfilS(3) Bond and Clearfil SE Bond. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, irradiation application did not affect the microleakage of dental adhesive systems.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectdental adhesivesen_US
dc.subjectirradiationen_US
dc.subjectradiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectmicroleakageen_US
dc.titleEffect of Radiotherapy on the Microleakage of Adhesive Systemsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage305en_US
dc.identifier.endpage309en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Adhesive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster