Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDemircan, Sabri
dc.contributor.authorYazici, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorDurna, Kenan
dc.contributor.authorKilicaslan, Fethi
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorPinar, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorGulel, Okan
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:06:45Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:06:45Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0160-9289
dc.identifier.issn1932-8737
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20345
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18696
dc.descriptionWOS: 000265195500011en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19353699en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In this study, we sought to investigate the relation of gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels with the significance of coronary artery disease (CAD), clinical presentation, left ventricular (LV) function, and inflammatory activity. Methods: A total of 235 patients (mean age: 60.1 +/- 10.5 years, 166[70%] males) who had coronary angiography were included in the study. Patients who had CAD constituted the study group (Group 1, n = 189) and patients who had insignificant coronary disease or normal coronary activity constituted the control group (Group 2, n = 46). Results: GGT levels were higher in Group 1 than Group 2 (38.7 +/- 30.9 U/L versus 27.5 +/- 17.5 U/L, p = 0.025). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower in Group 1 than Group 2 (52.6% +/- 11.7% versus 58.8% +/- 11.3%, P<0.002). GGT activity (40.2 +/- 32.5 U/L versus 29.1 +/- 18.3 U/L, P<0.002) and c-reactive protein (CRP) levels (33.9 +/- 43.6 mg/dl versus 17.8 +/- 29.8 mg/dl, P<0.002) were higher, LVEF (52.6% +/- 12.1% versus 56.5% +/- 11.0%, P = 0.021) was lower in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared with stable CAD group. In regression analysis, CRIP levels (p<0.0001, odds ratio [OR]= 3.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10<OR<0.32), LVEF (p = 0.016, OR = -2.44, 95% Cl - 0.95<OR<-0.10) and LV end-diastolic pressure (P = 0.015, OR = 4.31, 95% Cl - 1.19<OR -0.13) were independent predictors of GGT activity. Conclusions: The increased GGT activity is related to LV function, clinical stability, and inflammatory activity rather than the severity of CAD, Measurement of GGT activity may be useful in predicting cardiovascular risk.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1002/clc.20345en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleThe Importance of Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Activity in Patients with Coronary Artery Diseaseen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage220en_US
dc.identifier.endpage225en_US
dc.relation.journalClinical Cardiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster