Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDurmus, Dilek
dc.contributor.authorAlayli, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorUzun, Oguz
dc.contributor.authorTander, Berna
dc.contributor.authorCantuerk, Ferhan
dc.contributor.authorBek, Yueksel
dc.contributor.authorErkan, Levent
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:07:01Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:07:01Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn1297-319X
dc.identifier.issn1778-7254
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.06.013
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18749
dc.descriptionAnnual European Congress of Rheumatology (EULAR 2007) -- JUN 13-16, 2007 -- Barcelona, SPAINen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000264461400007en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19084457en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of two different home-based daily exercise programs on pulmonary functions in the patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: Fifty-one patients with AS were distributed into three groups. Group 1 (n = 19) was given a conventional exercise regimen. Group 2 (n = 19) received exercises based on the Global Posture Reeducation (GPR) method. Group 3 (n = 13) was accepted as the control group. Patients were assessed according to pain, functional capacity (The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index - BASFI), disease activity (The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index - BASDAI), chest expansion, pulmonary function parameters, and 6-min walk distance (6MWD) test. Results: Although there were significant improvements for BASDAI and BASH scores in all groups, significant improvements in the VAS pain, chest expansion, pulmonary function parameters and 6MWD test were observed in the exercise groups. The improvements in pain, functional capacity, disease activity, chest expansion, pulmonary function parameters and 6MWD test were better in the exercise groups than in the control group. The GPR method resulted in greater improvements than the conventional exercise program in specific pulmonary function parameters like forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and peak expiratory flow parameters. Conclusion: Both exercises are efficient in improving pulmonary functions. Since the improvements in pulmonary function tests were greater in the patients who performed the exercise according to GPR method, motivated patients should be encouraged to perform this exercise program. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean League Against Rheumatismen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier France-Editions Scientifiques Medicales Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.06.013en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnkylosing spondylitisen_US
dc.subjectPulmonary functionsen_US
dc.subjectExerciseen_US
dc.subject6MWD testen_US
dc.subjectBASDAIen_US
dc.subjectBASFIen_US
dc.titleEffects of two exercise interventions on pulmonary functions in the patients with ankylosing spondylitisen_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume76en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage150en_US
dc.identifier.endpage155en_US
dc.relation.journalJoint Bone Spineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record