Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTander, B.
dc.contributor.authorShanti, C. M.
dc.contributor.authorKlein, M. D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:07:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:07:16Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.issn0939-7248
dc.identifier.issn1439-359X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1039006
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/18796
dc.descriptionWOS: 000264062000003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19065505en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of different access methods for the treatment of pyloric stenosis (PS). Methods: Since 2001, we have operated on children with PS using three different access methods: classic right upper quadrant transverse incision (TI), incision on the superior umbilical fold (UI) and laparoscopic (L). We reviewed the records of these children with special emphasis on the number and characteristics of complications, operative time, and length of stay (LOS). Results: We identified 256 patients (212 M, 44 F) with a mean age of 36 days. 138 procedures were performed using TI, 18 with UI and 100 laparoscopically. The mean operative time for patients with TI was 35.9 +/- 8.6 min, and for those with UI 31.8 +/- 9.3 min. Patients in the L group had a mean operative time of 29.8 +/- 11 min. Although the operative time for TI was significantly greater than that of L, the differences between the TI and UI groups and between UI and L groups did not reach statistical significance. For the TI, UI and L groups, the mean overall LOS was 3.22 +/- 0.3 days, 3.39 +/- 0.4 days and 2.94 +/- 0.2 days, and the mean postoperative LOS was 1.52 +/- 0.1 days, 1.44 +/- 0.2 days, and 1.56 +/- 0.1 days, respectively. No significant difference in LOS was found. One patient from each group had a wound infection. While three of four perforations occurred in the L group and the fourth was in the TI group, the difference in rates of perforation among the groups did not achieve statistical significance. The perforation during open surgery was typical, occurring on the duodenal end during spreading of the pyloric muscle. The perforations in the L group were atypical: one was a grasper injury to the duodenum; another was on the gastric end of the pyloric incision and the third Occurred not during spreading of the pyloric muscle but during the cutting of it. The pylorus was relatively small in this particular case (12 mm in length). Conclusion: While the operative time of laparoscopic repair for PS is less than in either of the open approaches, laparoscopic surgery may increase the risk for atypical injuries to the bowel. Therefore, proper attention should be paid to dissection of the structures and the selection of laparoscopic instruments. Incision on the superior umbilical fold is a reasonable alternative access for the treatment of PS.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGeorg Thieme Verlag Kgen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1055/s-2008-1039006en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectpyloric stenosisen_US
dc.subjectlaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectumbilical fold incisionen_US
dc.subjectpyloromyotomyen_US
dc.titleAccess to the Hypertrophic Pylorus: Does It Make a Difference to the Patient?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage14en_US
dc.identifier.endpage16en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Pediatric Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster