Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKurne, Asli
dc.contributor.authorIsikay, Ilksen Colpak
dc.contributor.authorKarlioguz, Kader
dc.contributor.authorKalyoncu, Umut
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Omer Faruk
dc.contributor.authorCalguneri, Meral
dc.contributor.authorKarabudak, Rana
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:12:54Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:12:54Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn0340-5354
dc.identifier.issn1432-1459
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0882-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/19131
dc.descriptionWOS: 000262651400002en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 19156485en_US
dc.description.abstractAcute isolated neurological syndromes, such as optic neuropathy or transverse myelopathy, may cause diagnostic problems since they can be the first presentations of a number of diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and collageneous tissue disorders. In the present study, particular systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjogren syndrome (pSS) patients, who were followed up with the initial diagnosis of possible MS with no evidence of collagen tissue disorders for several years, are described. Five patients with the final diagnosis of SLE and five pSS patients are evaluated with their neurologic, systemic and radiologic findings. Over several years, all developed some systemic symptoms like arthritis, arthralgia, headache, dry mouth and eyes unexpected in MS. During the regular and close follow-up laboratory evaluations of vasculitic markers revealed positivity, leading to the final definite diagnosis of SLE or pSS. Patients with atypical neurological presentation of MS, a relapsing remitting clinical profile, or lack of response to the regular MS treatment should be evaluated for the presence of a connective tissue disease. Various laboratory tests, such as cerebrospinal fluid findings, autoantibodies profile, markers, cranial and spinal magnetic resonance imaging, can be helpful for the differential diagnosis. Lack of response to the regular multiple sclerosis treatment, even increasing rate of relapses can force the clinician for the differential diagnosis. In particular cases an accurate diagnosis can only be made after close follow-up.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00415-008-0882-yen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectmultiple sclerosisen_US
dc.subjectcollagen tissue disordersen_US
dc.titleA clinically isolated syndrome: A challenging entityen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume255en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1625en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1635en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Neurologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record