Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorNural, Mehmet Selim
dc.contributor.authorGokce, Erkan
dc.contributor.authorDanaci, Murat
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Ilkay Koray
dc.contributor.authorDiren, H. Baris
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:14:23Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:14:23Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X
dc.identifier.issn1872-7727
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.04.022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/19394
dc.descriptionDIREN, HALDUN BARIS/0000-0001-8958-2040en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000255581200010en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 17555901en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) is a liver-specific contrast agent also showing a distribution in the extracellular compartment which is recommended to be used at standard dose (0.05 mmol/kg) in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of liver lesions. However, its use at 0.1 mmol/kg is gradually increasing in recent clinical practice. Which dose should we use in routine MRI of liver lesions from now on? This study investigated the efficacy of Gd-BOPTA at a standard dose versus 0.1 mmol/kg dose in demonstrating diagnostic data in MRI of focal liver lesions. Materials and methods: The study included 47 patients with focal liver lesions. Twenty-two patients received standard dose and 25 patients received 0.1 mmol/kg dose Gd-BOPTA intravenously. MRI of both groups was carried out with T1-A FLASH-2D) and T2-A TURBO spin echo before contrast injection and T1-A FLASH-2D sequences in dynamic and late phase (90th minute) after the contrast injection. The lesion conspicuity for each image was evaluated qualitatively. Liver signal to noise ratio (SNR), absolute lesion-liver contrast to noise ratio (CNR), mean lesion-liver CNR and contrast enhancement rate of the liver obtained from both groups were compared quantitatively. Results: While liver contrast enhancement rate in the group receiving standard dose Gd-BOPTA were 41% +/- 42 in the arterial phase, 66% +/- 58 in the portal phase, 45% +/- 45 in the venous phase and 42% +/- 88 in the late phase, these values were 43% +/- 59, 86% +/- 73, 63% +/- 75 and 61% +/- 105, respectively, in the group receiving the dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. There were no statistically significant differences between the means of both groups. While the absolute lesion-liver CNR values were 18 +/- 15 precontrast, 22 +/- 18 in the arterial phase, 19 +/- 17 in the portal phase, 15 +/- 10 in the venous phase and 24 +/- 26 in the late phase in the group receiving the standard dose Gd-BOPTA, these values were 13 +/- 11, 18 +/- 15, 15 +/- 15, 13 +/- 13 and 19 +/- 21, respectively, in the group receiving the 0.1 mmol/kg dose. There were no statistically significant differences between the means of both groups (p > 0.05). However, when the mean lesion-liver CNR values were compared, there was statistically significant difference between each arterial and portal phases of metastases in both groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference found in other lesions. When lesion conspicuity scores were compared, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusion: In liver lesions, similar diagnostic data are obtained in dynamic and late phase MRI with either standard dose Gd-BOPTA or with a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. Because there was a difference in only metastases in both groups, in oncological patients who are being investigated for liver metastasis, it is expedient to use a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Ireland Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.04.022en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectgadobenate dimeglumineen_US
dc.subjectfocal liver lesionsen_US
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.titleFocal liver lesions: Whether a standard dose (0.05 mmol/kg) gadobenate dimeglumine can provide the same diagnostic data as the 0.1 mmol/kg doseen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume66en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage65en_US
dc.identifier.endpage74en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster