dc.contributor.author | Sarac, Duygu | |
dc.contributor.author | Turk, Tamer | |
dc.contributor.author | Elekdag-Turk, Selma | |
dc.contributor.author | Sarac, Y. Sinasi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T15:19:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T15:19:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0893-2174 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1942-4426 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/19812 | |
dc.description | Elekdag-Turk, Selma/0000-0002-2799-6501 | en_US |
dc.description | WOS: 000250384600004 | en_US |
dc.description | PubMed: 17944333 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to compare the surface roughness produced by polishing 2 all-ceramic materials after surface conditioning. Air particle abrasion (APA) with 25-mu m aluminum oxide, 9.6% hydrofluoric acid (HFA) and APA + HFA were applied for ceramic surface conditioning. Subsequently, the ceramics were subjected to 3 polishing techniques: polishing kit, polishing paste, and polishing kit + polishing paste. Surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated profilometrically. The highest Delta Ra values were obtained with the polishing kit and polishing kit + paste for the APA + HFA groups. No significant differences were observed among the polishing paste groups. Combining a polishing kit and polishing paste produced the smoothest ceramic surfaces. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Quintessence Publishing Co Inc | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of 3 polishing techniques for 2 all-ceramic materials | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 20 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 465 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 468 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | International Journal of Prosthodontics | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |