Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYucel, Ali Cagin
dc.contributor.authorCiftci, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:25:30Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:25:30Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.issn1079-2104
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.02.007
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/20412
dc.descriptionYucel, Ali Cagin/0000-0003-0080-9726en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000207879500017en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 16997102en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives. The aim of this study was to compare bacterial penetration following obturation with 5 different techniques. Study design. This study was performed on 120 teeth including negative control (n = 10), positive control (n = 10), and experimental groups (n = 100). One hundred teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups of 20 teeth each and obturated with System B (Sb), Lateral Compaction (Lc), Thermafil (T), Single Pro Taper Gutta-percha (P), and laterally compacted Pro Taper Gutta-percha (PLc). Enterococcus faecalis was used for determination of the bacterial penetration. Evaluation was carried out for 60 days. Results. At 30 days, the chi(2) test showed that the slowest penetration was observed in Group Sb and Group PLc, which were not significantly different from each other. The fastest penetration in the all experimental groups was observed in Group T and Group P, which were not significantly different from one another. Also, there was no statistically significance difference (P > .05) among all groups at 60 days. Conclusion. It may be concluded that under the conditions of this study System B and laterally compacted ProTaper Gutta-percha prevent bacterial penetration of the root canal at 30 days. Furthermore, there was no difference among obturation techniques at 60 days. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;102:e88-e92)en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.02.007en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEffects of different root canal obturation techniques on bacterial penetrationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume102en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE88en_US
dc.identifier.endpageE92en_US
dc.relation.journalOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record