| dc.contributor.author | Ozdogan, T | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T15:38:10Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T15:38:10Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0009-4536 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2192-6549 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/21354 | |
| dc.description | Ozdogan, Telhat/0000-0002-0211-770X | en_US |
| dc.description | WOS: 000224625900030 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | We critically analyzed the comments of Guseinov on our paper. Contrary to his comments, we show that the formulae we presented in our paper for multicenter electric multipole moment integrals over integer and noninteger n-STOs are different and not derived from his formulae. Therefore, the formulae and numerical values presented in our paper are original. Meanwhile, the comment of Guseinov about the transformability of our formulae into his formulae should be regarded as a sound and a nice contribution to the evaluation of multicenter integrals over integer and noninteger n-STOs. On the other hand, it is demonstrated that the other comments made by Guseinov are unjust. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Wiley-V C H Verlag Gmbh | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Slater type orbitals | en_US |
| dc.subject | overlap integrals | en_US |
| dc.subject | electric multipole moment integrals | en_US |
| dc.subject | noninteger principal quantum numbers | en_US |
| dc.title | Reply to comment on "Evaluation of multicenter electric multipole moment integrals over integer and noninteger n-STOs" | en_US |
| dc.type | editorial | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 51 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 5A | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 1079 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 1080 | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |
