Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeblebicioglu, H
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, M
dc.contributor.authorEsen, S
dc.contributor.authorTuncer, I
dc.contributor.authorFindik, D
dc.contributor.authorUral, O
dc.contributor.authorTasova, Y
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T15:48:50Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T15:48:50Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.issn1120-009X
dc.identifier.issn1973-9478
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2002.14.2.140
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/22049
dc.descriptionLeblebicioglu, Hakan/0000-0002-6033-8543; Dizbay, Murat/0000-0003-4120-0781en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000175365800003en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 12017368en_US
dc.description.abstractA multicenter antimicrobial surveillance program was established in Turkey in 1995 to monitor the predominant Gram-negative pathogens from intensive care units (ICUs) and antimicrobial resistance patterns of these isolates. Sixteen hospitals participated in the study and a total of 1479 isolates from 1100 patients were collected. The isolates were tested for their susceptibility against 13 antibiotics by E-test method. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for each isolate were determined for imipenem, ceftazidime, ceftazidime-clavulanate, cefoperazone-sulbactam, ceftriaxone, cefepime, cefuroxime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, gentamicin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin. The most common isolates were Pseudomonas spp. (28.2%), Escherichia coli (19.2%) and Klebsiella spp. (19.1%). We found very high resistance rates to all major antibiotics that are used to treat serious infections. Although imipenem is the most active agent, it had an overall susceptibility rate of 68%. Half of the tested Klebsiella spp. strains were found to produce ESBL. This is a very high rate when compared with the literature. Cross-resistance among species was also investigated. 52% of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains were also resistant to imipenem, 80% to ceftazidime, 97% to ceftriaxone, 86% to amikacin and 19% of imipenem-resistant strains were susceptible to ceftazidime and 18% to amikacin. When susceptibilities of the years 1995 and 1999 were compared, the most interesting finding was the decrease in resistance to 3(rd) generation cephalosporins. In conclusion, this national clinical isolate database shows that resistance rates are high, the change over years is not predictable and continuous surveillance is necessary to monitor antimicrobial resistance and to guide antibacterial therapy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1179/joc.2002.14.2.140en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectintensive care unit infectionen_US
dc.subjectantimicrobial surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectresistance patternsen_US
dc.subjectimipenem resistanceen_US
dc.subjectcephalosporin resistance patternsen_US
dc.titleSurveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative isolates from intensive care units in Turkey: Analysis of data from the last 5 yearsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage140en_US
dc.identifier.endpage146en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Chemotherapyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record