Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKocamanoğlu I.S.
dc.contributor.authorŞahinoğlu A.H.
dc.contributor.authorTür A.
dc.contributor.authorÜstün E.
dc.contributor.authorKarakaya D.
dc.contributor.authorBariş S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:15:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:15:16Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.issn1300-2996
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/2676
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the effects of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia on the first analgesic requirement time and postoperative complications. After institutional ethical committee approval 60 female patients, ASA I-II, ages between 30-60 years, undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly divided into three groups. For the induction of anesthesia; propofol 2 mg.kg-1 in Group I. midazolam 0.3 mg.kg-1 in Group II and thiopental 7 mg.kg-1 in Group III were administered intravenously. Also, alfentanil 25 ?g.kg-1 was given iv in Group I and II during induction of anesthesia. Endotracheal intubation was facilitated with 0.1 mg.kg-1 vecuronium in all groups. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol 9 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the first 30 minutes and then 4.5 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the rest of operation until 5 minutes before skin closure in Group I and midazolam 0.125 mg.kg-1.h-1 for the duration of operation until abdominal fascia closure in Group II. The Group III patients were taken 0.8-1.5% isoflurane. In Group I and II, alfentanil 25 ?g.kg-1.h-1 were infused until the abdominal fascia closure. In all groups 67% N2O in oxygen were given. The first time to verbal response, postoperative first analgesic requirement time and postoperative complications were noted. First analgesic requirement time was shorter in Group III than the others. Postoperative complications were more common in Group III. In conclusion; postoperative period confort of general anesthesia is best in TIVA.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMidazolamen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative complicationsen_US
dc.subjectPropofolen_US
dc.subjectTIVAen_US
dc.titleComparison of the effects of different general anesthetic techniques and agents on postoperative analgesia and complicationsen_US
dc.title.alternativeFarkli genel anestezi teknik ve i?laçlarinin postoperatif analjezi ve komplikasyonlara etkilerinin karşiaştirilmasien_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume18en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage41en_US
dc.identifier.endpage47en_US
dc.relation.journalOndokuz Mayis Universitesi Tip Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record