dc.contributor.author | Belet N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Uysal S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bernay F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Curses N. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-21T09:15:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-21T09:15:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0019-5456 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02728849 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/2699 | |
dc.description | PubMed: 11237229 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Fifty-six patients with postpneumonic empyema were treated by sulbactam/ampicillin or cephalothin and netilmicin. Dose of sulbactam/ampicillin was 200mg/kg per day and of cephalothin was 200mg/kg per day, and of netilmicin was 5mg/kg per day. Sulbactam/ampicillin alone was used in 27 patients. Twenty-nine patients were treated with cephalothin plus netilmicin. Days on intravenous antibiotics, days with chest tube, decortication rate, and duration of hospitalization were significantly shorter in sulbactam/ampicillin treatment group compared to cephalothin plus netilmicin group. This study shows that sulbactam/ampicillin is a safe and effective agent in the treatment of postpneumonic empyema in childhood. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Indian Journal of Pediatrics | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1007/BF02728849 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Childhood | en_US |
dc.subject | Empyema | en_US |
dc.subject | Sulbactam/ampicillin | en_US |
dc.subject | Treatment | en_US |
dc.title | Postpneumonic empyema in childhood | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | OMÜ | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 68 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 14 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Indian Journal of Pediatrics | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |