Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaris S.
dc.contributor.authorSarihasan B.
dc.contributor.authorKarakaya D.
dc.contributor.authorGüldogus F.
dc.contributor.authorTü A.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:15:31Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:15:31Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/2738
dc.description.abstractIn this randomized, double-blinded study, the preemptive effects of intravenous and epidural fentanyl analgesia were compared with post- incisional analgesia in 40 patients undergoing orthophedic surgery of the lower extremities. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups; intravenous or epidural analgesia, with twenty patients in each group. General anesthesia was induced with thiopentone 5-6 mgkg-1 and maintained with 0.8-1.0% isoflurane and 66% nitrous oxide in 33% O2. The trachea was intubated after administration of vecuronium 0.1 mgkg-1. Patients in the epidural analgesia groups then received, by random allocation, 2 ?gkg-1 fentanyl with 0.9% saline (total volume 0.15 mlkg-1) after epidural catheter replacement 15 minutes before (preemptive epidural analgesia group- PEEA) or 15 minutes after (epidural analgesia group-EA) the surgical incision. Patients in the analgesia groups received, by random allocation, 2 ?gkg-1 fentanyl intravenously immediately after induction (preemptive intravenous analgesia group-PEIV) or 15 minutes after the surgical incision (intravenous analgesia group-IV). Visual analogue pain scores (VAS) and postoperative morphine consumption in the preemptive groups were consistently lower than in the analgesia groups, although there was no statistical significance. Similarly, the first analgesic requirement time was longer in the PEEA group than in the EA group. Differences in the plasma concentration of glucose and cortisol were neither consistently nor significantly different between the study groups. In regard to these findings, we believe that with the management of patients with 2 ?gkg-1 fentanyl intravenously or epidurally before painful stimuli lowers the VAS and postoperative analgesic use. Higher doses of fentanyl may be necessary for optimal and significant results.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesicsen_US
dc.subjectFentanylen_US
dc.subjectOpioiden_US
dc.subjectOrthopedicen_US
dc.subjectPreemptiveen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.titleSmall-dose fentanyl in intravenous versus epidural preemptive analgesiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage63en_US
dc.identifier.endpage69en_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record