Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzdamar Ş.O.
dc.contributor.authorSarikaya Ş.
dc.contributor.authorYildiz L.
dc.contributor.authorAtilla M.K.
dc.contributor.authorKandemir B.
dc.contributor.authorYildiz S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:19:40Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:19:40Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.issn0301-1623
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/3108
dc.descriptionPubMed: 8738623en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study a total of 96 patients with prostatic carcinoma were evaluated retrospectively. Sections prepared from paraffin blocks were examined and all cases were scored according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and Gleason grading systems. We investigated intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of two grading systems in prostatic adenocarcinomas. In our study the intraobserver reproducibilities of the WHO and Gleason systems were 75.0% and 78.1%, respectively. The interobserver reproducibilities of the WHO and Gleason grading systems were 60.4% and 70.8%, respectively. While there was no difference between intraobserver and interobserver variations in the Gleason system (p > 0.05), there was significant difference between intraobserver and interobserver variations in the WHO system (p < 0.05).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleIntraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of WHO and Gleason histologic grading systems in prostatic adenocarcinomasen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage73en_US
dc.identifier.endpage77en_US
dc.relation.journalInternational Urology and Nephrologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster