Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYeşilyurt C.
dc.contributor.authorBulucu B.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:23:15Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.issn1526-3711
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/3470
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (? TBS) of four total-etch adhesives [Excite (EB), Prime & Bond NT (PBNT), Single Bond (SB), and One Coat Bond (OCB)] by comparing them to five self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB), Xeno III (X III), Prompt L-Pop (PLP), AQ Bond (AQB), and Tyrian/One Step plus (TOSP)] at different dentinal areas. In addition the interface between the adhesive resins and dentin was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Methods and Materials: Superficial occlusal dentin of extracted human molars was exposed and finished with wet 800-grit silicon carbide paper. A block of composite resin was then bonded to the molar samples with the above adhesives according to the manufacturers' instructions. After 24 hours in water at 37°C, the specimens were sectioned into 1 mm thick slices and divided into two regional subgroups according to their relationship to pulp tissue using visual criteria: pulp center and pulp periphery. The slices were then trimmed for the microtensile bond test and subjected to a tensile force and crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Two-way analysis of variance was performed for statistical analyses. In addition the bond strengths for nine adhesive systems for each dentinal area were compared using the Post-Hoc test. The resin-dentin interfaces for each adhesive system were observed under a SEM. Results: Mean ? TBS ranged from (25.2 MPa) for TOSP to (48.9 MPa) for PBNT. The bond strengths of total-etch adhesive systems were not significantly different, and were higher than self-etch adhesive systems, except for CSEB (p<0.05). No significant regional difference was observed for all of the nine adhesive systems (p>0.05). SEM observation showed there is not a standard hybridization for adhesive systems. Conclusion: Different dentinal areas may not exhibit as great an influence on bond strengths using new adhesive systems.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive systemsen_US
dc.subjectDentin areaen_US
dc.subjectMicrotensile testen_US
dc.titleBond strength of total-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: A microtensile bond strength testen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage14en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Contemporary Dental Practiceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record